Smithb9841
WKR
- Joined
- May 26, 2019
- Messages
- 448
What in the hell caused that damage??? is splatter bullet code for a damn hand grenade hahaSplatter bullets for the win!
230 yards. Put both fists in the exit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What in the hell caused that damage??? is splatter bullet code for a damn hand grenade hahaSplatter bullets for the win!
230 yards. Put both fists in the exit.
As I stated earlier. Arrogance leads the conversation. Neck shots simply present a smaller target and therfore a higher likelihood of a poor hit that leaves a wounded deer running around the woods. Your earlier comment regarding archery is likely true but it has no bearing on the conversation. The debate is whether a neck shot is ethical. I think most agree it is very lethal if executed properly but it is more challenging than a lung shot. There is no debating that. How hunters interpret that for their personal ethics isn't up to you or me.Thats not a failure. That was a miss
300 wsm 150 gr NBTWhat in the hell caused that damage??? is splatter bullet code for a damn hand grenade haha
Too hard?Bullet too hard
Friend and me were hunting Nat'l Forest when we spotted a doe that looked horrible.This is a neck shot I took at 393 yards a few years back. It was very effective, and there was almost zero meat loss. I was prone with a bipod and rear bag. I had crawled as close as I would get in that situation. I'm a way better and more experienced shooter now and would probably not take this particular shot in those conditions today.
I guess I "get it" but again, either you're taking a shot you know you can make or you're playing the "pull and pray" game on a live animal. There's not much similarity to me shooting a buck that is standing stationary giving me a good angle with my 45/70 at 20-25 yards and lobbing one in at 400. I can put 10 shots into an inch black square with that rifle at 25 yards.Friend and me were hunting Nat'l Forest when we spotted a doe that looked horrible.
As we got closer, it was evident her lower jaw was missing.
We shot her and left her lay. Her lower jaw wound was horrendous and you could tell she was extremely stressed.
No telling how long she had been without water.
If you want to do neck/head shots, go for it! I won't except in cases of "emergency"(?)!
Yes too hard. With an expanding bullet, his neck shot deer would have been laying there dead.Too hard?
A round ball doesn't "expand". Just punches a caliber sized hole in and out.
My muzzleloader days are over, but my favorite load in my T/C Renegade .54 was a .429 caliber, 240 grain solid nose in a sabot with 90 grains of fffG.
Never had a deer run over 50 yards. There was a .429 hole entry and a .429 hole exit.
Not sure about the "why", but you could literally eat right up to the bullet hole.
A large, heavy, slow moving bullet doesn't leave much blood shot meat.
A guy I knew hunted with a .22-250. Those medium sized east Texas whitetails were blood shot from mid neck to last rib with a classic behind the leg shot.....and seldom was a shoulder salvageable!
I am not advocating for anyone to take a particular shot or not. I would be much less likely to take the shot today than I was at that time.Friend and me were hunting Nat'l Forest when we spotted a doe that looked horrible.
As we got closer, it was evident her lower jaw was missing.
We shot her and left her lay. Her lower jaw wound was horrendous and you could tell she was extremely stressed.
No telling how long she had been without water.
If you want to do neck/head shots, go for it! I won't except in cases of "emergency"(?)!
If it’s not a long shot from a known distance with a good rest, the neck shot is my favorite for deer. It’s quick and clean and the blood shot doesn’t spread like it does behind the shouldersI usually always bow hunt and last year was the first year I shot a deer with a firearm. I drew a state park hunt which is firearms only. I'm shooting a .44mag and had a prefect neck shot opportunity but never more than that. I opted not taking the shot. After talking to some people who've hunted a lot longer than I have, they say it's an ethical shot. I'm so used to bow hunting not sure if I should have taken that shot? Thoughts?
This sums it up for me as well. Considering I'm usually hunting in the woods and a "long" shot would be 50 yards or so, it's more if the deer gives me a good, stationary shot than anything else. Heck, I usually have a nice steady rest on the rail of the stand.If it’s not a long shot from a known distance with a good rest, the neck shot is my favorite for deer. It’s quick and clean and the blood shot doesn’t spread like it does behind the shoulders
I have shot several there and watched a bunch more, and it’s been no drama every time. It’s a horrible shot with a bow, and shouldn’t be considered ever, but with a rifle, it works great
100% this crazy crap is ridiculous shooting @ 500+ yardsI'd rather see more sub-100-yard neck shots than this long-range fad we've got going now, especially if we are discussing ethics.
Yep, neck shots you either kill them or miss them........During my elk hunt last week, I found someone's 6x6 bull in a canyon that had not been recovered. Reported the find to game and fish. Upon closer inspection I found that it was a neck shot as I found the entrance hole. You can see that it had been dead air few days as the eyes have been pecked out, the bird droppings on it and the smell of rot.
It's not either/or. There is the third, more true situation where you *think* you can make the shot.I guess I "get it" but again, either you're taking a shot you know you can make or you're playing the "pull and pray" game on a live animal. There's not much similarity to me shooting a buck that is standing stationary giving me a good angle with my 45/70 at 20-25 yards and lobbing one in at 400. I can put 10 shotsa into an inch black square with that rifle at 25 yards.