Matt5266
WKR
Really? Why?I’d go 6.5 prc over 7 prc, especially for mule deer. I’ve been using a 6.5 cm the last few years and am very happy with how dead it kills em. The prc should kill them even deader.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Really? Why?I’d go 6.5 prc over 7 prc, especially for mule deer. I’ve been using a 6.5 cm the last few years and am very happy with how dead it kills em. The prc should kill them even deader.
Can you explain why you think the 6.5 isnt good for elk but the 7 is?Most here for Muley's are saying the 6.5 PRC and that is an awesome choice. I went with the 7 PRC in case I ever want to shoot an Elk. You really can't go wrong with either. I will say that the 7 with a muzzle brake and recoil pad has less recoil than my old trusty 270.
@Muley_Addict 317No doubt that the .308 is a great cartridge. I don’t mean to throw hate on the .308 or the ruger. I’m just a sucker for a good looking cartridge and a smooth action. The action on the ruger is pretty rough in my opinion. Every time I go to cycle the action, it moves my scope off target.
I know, I’m very nitpicky. But I’m just looking an excuse to get a PRC. Thanks for the rec!
I would just want a heavier bullet for a long range shot on a trophy bull, especially in a herd bull situation where you can't close the distance due ot a hundred eyeballs on you. There is a reason Hornady brought out the 7 last in between the 6.5 and 300. It's because it is the better alternative for any big game animal and situation in North America. My 2 cents.Can you explain why you think the 6.5 isnt good for elk but the 7 is?
More velo begets more energy—> more dead.Really? Why?
Can you explain how more energy means more dead? I ask because I hit a fawn with over 10,000 ft/lbs of energy and it got up and ran away.More velo begets more energy—> more dead.
Not sure why you’d do that (unless it was your vehicle). Did it die though?Can you explain how more energy means more dead? I ask because I hit a fawn with over 10,000 ft/lbs of energy and it got up and ran away.
Absolutely. I 100% agree I don't need a new rifle. I WANT a new rifle haha. I don't plan on getting rid of my .308. Like you said, it is a great round. The ruger american .308 has definitely helped me learn the fundamentals and it's cheap to shoot which = more time at the range. I also shot my very first buck with it last season.My opinion is that you don't need a new rifle.
An uncle of mine piled up a impressive number of mule deer tags with a Remington 740 in .308 Winchester.
Whatever you don't like about your Ruger can probably be corrected / changed for less than the cost of a new TIKKA.
On paper, the difference between cartridges seems vast. In the real world, they all pretty much do the same thing on deer.
From 1985 to 2015, I filled 21 mule deer tags with the pipsqueak .250 Savage, made even more of a weakling by being fired from the 20" barrel of my Ruger M77RL Ultralight. My current 5.56 NATO hunting load has more energy at 200 to 300 yards and beyond, yet I never had to shoot an animal more than once with it. I also tagged to caribou with it and one bull elk.
A .308 Winchester will kill mule deer stone-cold dead beyond 400 yards. There is no such thing as deader than dead. None of the cartridges on your short list will kill mule deer deader than a .308 Winchester will.
Can you explain why you think the 6.5 isnt good for elk but the 7 is?
Same. Bergara 7prc for me. Used last year to kill my WY mule deer. Hopefully used this year for Elk.Most here for Muley's are saying the 6.5 PRC and that is an awesome choice. I went with the 7 PRC in case I ever want to shoot an Elk. You really can't go wrong with either. I will say that the 7 with a muzzle brake and recoil pad has less recoil than my old trusty 270.