More changes to Montana hunting on the horizon.

MT257

WKR
Joined
Sep 25, 2016
Messages
1,221
Over the years I was always told by the older guys to enjoy my hunting cause it is never gonna be better than it is today.

The state fish and game departments set the seasons, the quotas, and supposedly manage the resource. Have they done their job if the resource is clinging on a hope and a prayer?
Depends are we measuring the health of the herd or the money the Dept. can generate by selling a tag to take your weapon for walk?
 

Jon Boy

WKR
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
1,715
Location
Paradise Valley, MT
I just still can't on board with all of this ridiculous hunting pressure and low quality everyone is preaching here. My God is there giant bucks and bulls in every unit in the state that die of old age every year. I wish I was better hunter because where i hunt there are 180 in mule deer and 350 in bulls allllll dayyyy long. I have there sheds. It's not easy to hunt but if you want to hunt block management and state sections they will always be crowded, split season or not. It's ridiculous to expect easy elk and deer of high quality. It will never happen. Any where.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

peterk123

WKR
Joined
Sep 7, 2020
Messages
457
Location
Montana
I just still can't on board with all of this ridiculous hunting pressure and low quality everyone is preaching here. My God is there giant bucks and bulls in every unit in the state that die of old age every year. I wish I was better hunter because where i hunt there are 180 in mule deer and 350 in bulls allllll dayyyy long. I have there sheds. It's not easy to hunt but if you want to hunt block management and state sections they will always be crowded, split season or not. It's ridiculous to expect easy elk and deer of high quality. It will never happen. Any where.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
I moved to MT recently. I laugh at the discussions about pressure. You guys have no idea.

Picture a 60 acre public parcel with no less than five stands in there. Then picture a ten man drive during rifle season wiping out everything that walks. Now that is pressure. Welcome to Massachusetts.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2016
Messages
2,191
Turn it into 12 day increments for everyone and it would be like a majority of other states. Even more win win. Less folks in the woods at any given time, more licenses available, 1/2 the guys can’t kill in a 2 week period, etc…. Add some antler restrictions to protect the yearlings (2x2) deer and maybe we got something to start with.

I have no skin in this game, got a guided hunt next year and then you guys can continue to beat the system to death. Funny how this forum promotes hunting, tags, and points in every state on one hand, and bashing NR for various state induced problems on the other. LoL!

It’s sad to see the death spiral of hunting in my lifetime.


Also, I should mention I’m a nonresident.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2016
Messages
2,191
I moved to MT recently. I laugh at the discussions about pressure. You guys have no idea.

Picture a 60 acre public parcel with no less than five stands in there. Then picture a ten man drive during rifle season wiping out everything that walks. Now that is pressure. Welcome to Massachusetts.
I hunted in Pennsylvania for 30 years. These guys “out west” certainly make me chuckle when they talk about hunting pressure.
 

MT257

WKR
Joined
Sep 25, 2016
Messages
1,221
I hunted in Pennsylvania for 30 years. These guys “out west” certainly make me chuckle when they talk about hunting pressure.
I understand the pressure that is seen back east, but the influx seen in Montana today is astronomically higher than that of 10 years ago. Technology has played a large hand in that.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2016
Messages
2,191
I understand the pressure that is seen back east, but the influx seen in Montana today is astronomically higher than that of 10 years ago. Technology has played a large hand in that.
You could have triple the pressure you seen 10 years ago and you still wouldn't understand the pressure in the East. Lol
 

MT257

WKR
Joined
Sep 25, 2016
Messages
1,221
You could have triple the pressure you seen 10 years ago and you still don’t understand the pressure in the East. Lol
The point being the increased pressure, more tags issued, technology and accessible number of acres of huntable land are all for driving the elk, deer, and antelope on to private land where they then become off limits. Reducing some of that pressure will keep some of huntable critters on public lands.
 

Lawnboi

WKR
Joined
Mar 2, 2012
Messages
7,693
Location
North Central Wi
Hearing residents complain is so satisfying.

Some of you have absolutely no idea good you have it.
Back East when people want better hunting they lease, buy or work harder. Residents just need to quit whining and work harder so they can buy land. Can we say that now since we are condoning just pricing people out of hunting?

Cranky residents please read as sarcasm.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2022
Messages
373
Not a resident, but my $0.03:

I'll be headed to region 3/4/5, sounds like that gets the least pressure.

Thanks!
 

Rockydog

FNG
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
17
I'm not totally opposed to the idea yet, but this is a BIG change, they say because of "crowding and lack of success." I don't think we're in that bad of shape yet, this sounds like whining you see in the comments section on the FWP facebook page.


After watching the newly appointed FWP commissioner and commission in action this last year, I don't have much faith in the advisory committee having the public hunter's best interest in mind. The commission certainly had the big outfitters best interest in mind until they were called on it, and I don't expect them to stop trying to push outfitter friendly regs through. I am leery of any changes they propose.

Who are these people - anyone know?
The advisory group is a quality set of people and I believe in them. One of them is a friend hunting partner. Lifelong Montanan and outdoorsman. The current commissioners are a different story.
 

Rich M

WKR
Joined
Jun 14, 2017
Messages
5,106
Location
Orlando
I just still can't on board with all of this ridiculous hunting pressure and low quality everyone is preaching here. My God is there giant bucks and bulls in every unit in the state that die of old age every year. I wish I was better hunter because where i hunt there are 180 in mule deer and 350 in bulls allllll dayyyy long. I have there sheds. It's not easy to hunt but if you want to hunt block management and state sections they will always be crowded, split season or not. It's ridiculous to expect easy elk and deer of high quality. It will never happen. Any where.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Do you collect shed of animals that spend the entire year on that property? - or - are you collecting the sheds of the elk and mule deer that migrate like most of em do? Curious.
 

Jon Boy

WKR
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
1,715
Location
Paradise Valley, MT
Do you collect shed of animals that spend the entire year on that property? - or - are you collecting the sheds of the elk and mule deer that migrate like most of em do? Curious.
True blue public land deer and elk that are born, live and will die all on public. And obviously I collect them they migrated too. Which is also public...

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

mtwarden

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 18, 2016
Messages
9,487
Location
Montana
Obviously no easy answers.

It's definitely worth perusing the Advisory Board recommendations, they cover a wide range of topics related to elk hunting beyond choosing your weapon.

https://fwp.mt.gov/aboutfwp/public-comment-opportunities/emcag-recommendations

The department and the commission will ultimately decide if any of the recommendations are going to be adopted or partially adopted. That means they'll be another opportunity for the public to comment.

The scarier thing coming down the pike imho, is our Legislature meets again in a month. All bets are off on what they come up with. If past sessions are any indication, you can bet the vast majority of bills submitted will not be for the benefit of folks that hunt public lands.
 

Jolley78MT

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Aug 22, 2022
Messages
213
I wish they would go back to only issuing only 17K NR tags. Also, at the same time we may also need to look at the resident population as well. It has grown in recent years, I would assume we have also more R hunters too. At some point the whole OTC general deer tag is not going to be sustainable. I mean for crying out loud you see guys saying all over how hard the hunting conditions were this year and so what did they do they shoot a two point instead of eating a tag. No wonder the hunting conditions are getting worse.
No doubt I get so sick of hearing " well he wasn't the one I wanted but at least I filled my tag"

It's no wonder it's so damn hard to find a mature buck anymore
 

S.Clancy

WKR
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Messages
2,310
Location
Montana
Obviously no easy answers.

It's definitely worth perusing the Advisory Board recommendations, they cover a wide range of topics related to elk hunting beyond choosing your weapon.

https://fwp.mt.gov/aboutfwp/public-comment-opportunities/emcag-recommendations

The department and the commission will ultimately decide if any of the recommendations are going to be adopted or partially adopted. That means they'll be another opportunity for the public to comment.

The scarier thing coming down the pike imho, is our Legislature meets again in a month. All bets are off on what they come up with. If past sessions are any indication, you can bet the vast majority of bills submitted will not be for the benefit of folks that hunt public lands.
There is like 130 Wildlife bills so far.... http://laws.leg.mt.gov/legprd/LAW02...BJT_SBJ_CD=FISH&P_ENTY_ID_SEQ=&Z_ACTION2=Find

Luckily there is really well-organized opposition this year as opposed to 2021.
 
Top