MuleyFever
WKR
He said a 109 in a 6mm.Because I was quoting what he said.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He said a 109 in a 6mm.Because I was quoting what he said.
He said something with more mass penetrates further. That is not true. The 109 6mm has more mass than a 95gr 224. The 224 will penetrate further.He said a 109 in a 6mm.
Sorry, was out scouting mountain goats yesterday and didn’t get back home until late last night.Let's say Hunter A is using a 109g Eldm in some sort of 6mm cartridge and Hunter B is using an 88g Eldm.
1) The 109g bullet has just under 24% more lead it can use to create a better wound channel
2) The 109g bullet starts with 24% more mass which means it will likely penetrate farther on a large animal.
If a hunter can shoot their 6/6.5mm cartridge accurately, it makes sense to take advantage of their larger/heavier projectiles. Using a larger, heavier bullet is not going to make them less lethal.
Instead of trying to find the lightest possible cartridge that will work on big game, we should be searching for the sweet spot - biggest cartridge that the shooter can shoot accurately.
I ended up down the 22 centerfire rabbit hole by virtue of killing moose/elk/deer/bears etc etc etc with the typical Big Tough Animals Need Big Tough Bullets mindset, and then getting caught up in the New Rifle Syndrome.My only issue is really with the concept of using the least powerful cartridge possible on genuine game.
Going back to the original idea of using a 22 ARC, I would point to the 22 CM as the better option on big game for someone who wants to shoot a 22 caliber bullet.