Moose/Elk/Black Bear/Wolf Hunt 6.5CM Bullet Selection

SPDSpappy

FNG
Joined
Mar 8, 2018
Messages
65
Location
Metro East, St. Louis
I'm going on this hunt in a couple of months and am trying to figure out which bullet to use in my 6.5CM. I had initially planned on using Hornady 147gr ELD-M bullets, but after a recent gel test, I think I need to find another option.

I'm currently loading up ladders for the Berger 140gr Elite Hunter, Hornady 143gr ELD-X, and 130gr ELD-M to see which my rifle likes best. Ideally, I'd like to settle on one bullet for all scenarios (<100 yard shot vs. 200+ yards), rather than having to carry two different options. My original thought was to load the 143gr ELD-X for shorter distances in the mag, with another mag for longer-range shots (Berger or 130gr ELD-M). I'm okay with this approach, but it does add another layer of complexity that I'd prefer to avoid.

I'd appreciate your thoughts on which bullet to choose and your reasoning behind it (I’m an engineer, so I enjoy geeking out over the details). For reference, here’s the rifle setup these are going into: Viking Armament/XLR Element 4.0 Magnesium chassis with carbon fiber components, Zermatt Origin action, Timney Elite Hunter trigger, Proof Research carbon fiber barrel, NightForce NX-8 4-32 scope, and a Titanium Pro 4-port muzzle brake.

XLR Element Magnesium 65 Creedmoor.jpg
I'm also bringing my .300WM as a backup w/ Berger 205gr Elite Hunters (similar hardware to the 6.5CM, but aluminum chassis and no carbon fiber in the stock).
XLR 300 Win Mag - 6.jpg
 
If you truly enjoy geeking out. Get off of YouTube and read through these two threads.

As in, actually read them and learn. Take breaks and come back to where you left off later like a good book.

You’ll learn things about bullet construction, impact velocities, and what the bullets actually do on/in animals.


 
I'd appreciate your thoughts on which bullet to choose and your reasoning behind it (I’m an engineer, so I enjoy geeking out over the details).
Id go with the 125gn Hammer HHT. The solid will expand more consistently, the mushroom petals will quickly fracture off by design and radiate outward causing their own wound channels, the base acts like a wad cutter for deep penetration.
 
If you truly enjoy geeking out. Get off of YouTube and read through these two threads.

As in, actually read them and learn. Take breaks and come back to where you left off later like a good book.

You’ll learn things about bullet construction, impact velocities, and what the bullets actually do on/in animals.


I'll give them a read, thanks!!
 
If you truly enjoy geeking out. Get off of YouTube and read through these two threads.

As in, actually read them and learn. Take breaks and come back to where you left off later like a good book.

You’ll learn things about bullet construction, impact velocities, and what the bullets actually do on/in animals.


I guess this is my answer! Still reading through more of the thread though.
1752947052589.png
 
If you truly enjoy geeking out. Get off of YouTube and read through these two threads.

As in, actually read them and learn. Take breaks and come back to where you left off later like a good book.

You’ll learn things about bullet construction, impact velocities, and what the bullets actually do on/in animals.


Seems any of the 3 will work, but the 2 heavier of the three have better penetration... 1752947748091.png
 
The 147 ELD-M penetrates deeper than the Bergers I’ve used, and seems to stay together more reliably than the 143 ELD-X, too, based on reports I’ve seen.

My hunting partners and I have killed elk, MD, WT, moose, black bear, pronghorn, etc., with various ELD-M bullets. They routinely penetrate deeply while creating moderate wound channels. Start them at 2700 fps or less, and they’re very predictable.

My personal solution for the 6.5 CM is to load the 147 ELD-M as an all-around load. If I was to specialize things a bit more, I load a 127 LRX for short- to medium-range bone smashing without getting lead frags in my meat, and a 147 ELD-M for longer shots (which, coincidentally, afford me more time for careful bullet placement to avoid bone).
 
I don't have a dog in the fight, but there's plenty of firsthand data about the effectiveness of the ELD-M for hunting. As for thinking about carrying two different loads.... WHY? That's making things more complicated than they need to be. Murphy's Law, you WILL have the "wrong" load in the rifle when the opportunity presents itself.
 
I don't have a dog in the fight, but there's plenty of firsthand data about the effectiveness of the ELD-M for hunting. As for thinking about carrying two different loads.... WHY? That's making things more complicated than they need to be. Murphy's Law, you WILL have the "wrong" load in the rifle when the opportunity presents itself.
I agree w/ you and exactly why I did this post. It's been recommended to me that I use two different bullets given some concerns over the ELD-X at close range. Based on the first thread @mxgsfmdpx provided, I'm not so sure that's warranted.
 
Back
Top