"Features". Maybe they wanted to know what "features" we wanted.Anyone else get the impression that tract was pandering with this post and not really interested in improving their product line?
"Features". Maybe they wanted to know what "features" we wanted.Anyone else get the impression that tract was pandering with this post and not really interested in improving their product line?
For those who haven't seen it yet ...NF checks every scope they sell for impacts, tracking, adjustments, and RTZ. It can be done. And the way they check POI shift from top, back, and side impacts seems to work in real life.
I still reckon this would be a great topic for one of your photo essays that teach us all how to do stuff ... especially for those of us who don't already know and/or are limited to local gunsmiths who possibly don't either.Now, take that same rifle and bed the tang and lug tight, assemble as above, and the shift is not detectable.
Ryan - just checking: are you meaning 4-16x44 is your preference, or Form's?Pretty sure you mean 4-16x44
NF doesn’t embrace FFP? Say what?I prefer 3 power at 300 and 5 power at 500…etc. so a 10 power is more than enough for hunting and I would like you not likely take a shot on an animal at 10 power. Wonder why nightforce doesn’t embrace FFP. Still considering upgrading our current scopes to this one to add zero stop.
He sure went dark on us once the hard questions started! Posted a weak and vague response then ran."Features". Maybe they wanted to know what "features" we wanted.
I'd appreciate a "how to bed a Tikka" tutorial...I still reckon this would be a great topic for one of your photo essays that teach us all how to do stuff ... especially for those of us who don't already know and/or are limited to local gunsmiths who possibly don't either.
How many hundred people have used the 'how to mount a scope' and 'how to use the Mil Quad' reticle threads - they're better than most content you'll find on the interwebs, and in books from firearms publishers.
I still reckon this would be a great topic for one of your photo essays that teach us all how to do stuff ... especially for those of us who don't already know and/or are limited to local gunsmiths who possibly don't either.
How many hundred people have used the 'how to mount a scope' and 'how to use the Mil Quad' reticle threads - they're better than most content you'll find on the interwebs, and in books from firearms publishers.
Legend! Thanks ... from all of us.I’ll try to remember to do so on the next new T3.
Ryan - just checking: are you meaning 4-16x44 is your preference, or Form's?
If yours, any reason you want/need a 4-16 over a 3-12?
Sounds like what a lot of us are after.My perfect scope would be a 3-18x44 with the THLR reticle with none of the shit/clutter above the center dot. I do a fair amount of antlerless only hunts. That extra magnification is nice on those hunts to double check what you are shooting at. But a 4-16 would work too.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
My perfect scope would be a 3-18x44 with the THLR reticle with none of the shit/clutter above the center dot.
Mine too. However I’m not willing to give up any other aspect of the scope to get the 3-18x: reliability, durability, eyebox needs to be huge, good eye relief, depth of field, field of view, etc. 3-18x40somthing MM is all but perfect for a 0-as far as you can shoot yard scope, but it needs to be fantastically usable behind it. If I have to give up a bit of eyebox or DOF- nah, I’ll take a 4-16x.
I think it did take a turn he wasn't expecting. He bailed. I don't blame him. He didn't really have a clean exit path.Anyone else get the impression that tract was pandering with this post and not really interested in improving their product?
So a Tenmile with the THLR reticle?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Man I’d love that 4-16 ATACR in a 30 mil tube!Mine too. However I’m not willing to give up any other aspect of the scope to get the 3-18x: reliability, durability, eyebox needs to be huge, good eye relief, depth of field, field of view, etc. 3-18x40somthing MM is all but perfect for a 0-as far as you can shoot yard scope, but it needs to be fantastically usable behind it. If I have to give up a bit of eyebox or DOF- nah, I’ll take a 4-16x.
Yes.
I expect to have a few glimpses shown in YouTube episode 358 (public end of month). That scope had a "cleaned" hunting version of reticle. Not sure when it'll be on the market. Scope specs? Hard to believe, but it didn't register with me. But it felt "right" the three days I used it (prototype).