Mike Lee at it yet again (Oct 2025)

Poser

WKR
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
6,823
Location
Durango CO
A bill dropped Thursday by Utah Sen. Mike Lee proposes to open all federal land within 100 miles of the country’s northern and southern borders, including wilderness areas, to roads, border agents, motorized boats, clear-cutting, and even structures.

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz (R) is the only one of the bill’s sponsors from a state that borders Mexico or Canada. The rest are John Barrasso and Cynthia Lummis, both from Wyoming, Tennessee’s Marsha Blackburn, Mississippi’s Cindy Hyde-Smith, and Florida’s Rick Scott.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: LoH
I don't think Poser said anything about being for unsecured borders. This is nothing more than another attempt to gain more control of our public lands. No illegals are coming across the northern border and yet if this bill passes they will gain more access.
 
I'm not sure what the end purpose is but with it being Cruz bill and the crew that is cosponsoring the bill they are going to have more control of federal lands and they'll somehow make money at it or their business partners will. Lee and Cruz have proven to me to be for their own interests and not my interests.
 
This has nothing to do with border security and is 100% about allowing lawmakers to skirt policy or make things more beneficial to their sugar daddies in business so they can pillage what little undisturbed land is left for profit. I can't speak for the other states but I know there is some federal land in Texas that would fall into this category. Most of it already has border patrol access, along with most private property close to the border.
 
100%. Dude will not stop until he gets voted out. Utah, please figure this out.
I wish we could. I really don't understand what it is he provides to his voter base that keeps them loyal and unwilling to consider his motives behind his constant land bills.
 
I wish we could. I really don't understand what it is he provides to his voter base that keeps them loyal and unwilling to consider his motives behind his constant land bills.
It’s pretty hard to find a politician that meets every thing one wants. Sometimes it’s the lesser of two evils. One of Lees major downfalls is the public land stances but he is good on other things. He pulls a lot of votes due to a lot of his political stances mimicking the LDS standards.

For all the people saying Utah needs to get rid of this guy, remember that bills have cosponors. Make sure your elected officials arent cosponsoring these bills. Without cosponsors, many of these bills wouldn’t make it out of committee.
 
What a transparent scam!!

If they really cared about border security, they might ask for 1 to 5 miles. 100 miles is clearly just a corporate land grab.
 
When I contacted my Congressman (Mike Simpson) about the public land issues... this was the letter I got in response:



Thank you for contacting me regarding Idaho's public lands. I appreciate hearing from you and having the opportunity to respond.

Nearly two-thirds of the state of Idaho is federal land, which means that land management decisions made by federal agencies have a direct impact on our state’s economy and the lives of Idahoans who live, work, and recreate on or near federal lands. I think it is helpful to understand the history of federal land ownership and current policies in place regarding the disposal of federal lands.

In the 1960’s, Congress’s public land policy began to shift away from disposing of land and toward retaining it. In 1976, Congress passed the FLPMA which declared that retaining public lands in federal ownership was the policy of the United States. Although many western states and local governments reacted to this new policy by trying to claim federal land for the states or force the federal government to dispose of its lands, Courts have continually upheld the federal government’s constitutional right to retain ownership of federal lands.

Recognizing these costs and the fact that states, counties, and individuals have repeatedly been unsuccessful at attempting to assert authority over federal lands, I have worked throughout my time in Congress to ensure that federal land management agencies are good neighbors. For example, I have consistently supported full funding for the Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) program, through which the federal government compensates local governments for the loss of tax income due to the presence of federal land in their state or county. The PILT program is critical to communities throughout Idaho. I am also a strong supporter of funding the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act, which was passed in 2000 to provide an alternative source of education funding for counties with a high percentage of national forests or federal land.

In addition, as Chairman of the House Appropriations Subcommittee for Interior and the Environment, which oversees funding for federal land management agencies like the BLM, U.S. Forest Service, and the Fish and Wildlife Service, I am constantly encouraging these agencies to work with state and local officials and private individuals when making land management decisions in Idaho. I strongly believe that Idahoans should have a say in how the land on which they work and live is managed, and I will continue to advocate for a strong partnership between federal, state, and local land management agencies.

Once again, thank you for taking the time to contact me about this issue. As your representative in Congress, it is important to me to know your thoughts and opinions about issues affecting our nation today. I also encourage you to visit my website, https://simpson.house.gov, to sign up for my e-newsletter and to read more about my views on a variety of issues.
 
Back
Top