Crow Hunter TN
FNG
I was wrong. I could have sworn the 6X was .06, but it is .07.The latter, but I don't remember anything remarkable about it in low light/timber.
The inner portions of the RS1.2 are thicker (.1 vs .07), but the outer right/left/top post of the SWFA reticle is thicker (.4 vs 1.2)
View attachment 693006
View attachment 693010
I do have some of the fixed SWFAs and I am pretty certain the 6x has the same reticle sub tensions as the 3-9x. I haven't run across anyone who has used it and complained about the reticle being hard to see.
Here is a link to an old Optics Talk thread that has all the SWFA reticle measurements:
SWFA reticle subtensions.
Last edited: