Maven .6 LPVO Newest Newer New Model

Joined
Feb 2, 2020
Messages
2,665
Lite typically means reduced reliability.

I like how they had 1 model accidentally pass the drop test, now every scope they come out with is “Robust & designed for durability”

Between that and Spomer Maven is starting to get a little to cringe for me.
I don't think they state that anywhere on the product page for the ra.6
 

MT_Wyatt

WKR
Joined
Aug 20, 2014
Messages
2,184
Location
Montana
Really can’t understand the 34mm obsession and reticle. Seems pretty tactical. Turret and “robust” sound great.

Trijicon has similar optic this year that’s new.
 

z987k

WKR
Joined
Sep 9, 2020
Messages
1,732
Location
AK
Really can’t understand the 34mm obsession and reticle. Seems pretty tactical. Turret and “robust” sound great.

Trijicon has similar optic this year that’s new.
Ya, I can't imagine you need the extra elevation in the turret for a scope with 10 power at the top end. Or only a 28mm objective. You're not going to be using this past 1000.

Being it's 10x(As in 10 times the bottom number) on the magnification, I bet the image quality isn't all that great at the higher end. No scope with 10x is.
 

z987k

WKR
Joined
Sep 9, 2020
Messages
1,732
Location
AK
Lite typically means reduced reliability.

I like how they had 1 model accidentally pass the drop test, now every scope they come out with is “Robust & designed for durability”

Between that and Spomer Maven is starting to get a little to cringe for me.
The 1.2 accidentally passed? Wasn't is designed to pass?
 

Johnwell

FNG
Joined
Oct 11, 2024
Messages
10
Being it's 10x(As in 10 times the bottom number) on the magnification, I bet the image quality isn't all that great at the higher end. No scope with 10x is.
The high zoom ratio trend is one that I would really like to see end… They always seem to end up having worse glass and more critical eye boxes compared to a lower zoom ratio scope. Also is hard to implement a good FFP reticle across the whole zoom range.
 
OP
BRTreedogs
Joined
Nov 16, 2017
Messages
8,673
Location
Central Oregon
The 1.2 accidentally passed? Wasn't is designed to pass?
No they said in a podcast they did not do anything intentional as far as design was involved with durability.
And the update was just for features.

And all the other scopes should be the same.
 
OP
BRTreedogs
Joined
Nov 16, 2017
Messages
8,673
Location
Central Oregon

z987k

WKR
Joined
Sep 9, 2020
Messages
1,732
Location
AK
The high zoom ratio trend is one that I would really like to see end… They always seem to end up having worse glass and more critical eye boxes compared to a lower zoom ratio scope. Also is hard to implement a good FFP reticle across the whole zoom range.
Agreed.
 

MT_Wyatt

WKR
Joined
Aug 20, 2014
Messages
2,184
Location
Montana
Have you ever shot a 34mm optic?
Negative. Had a 35mm mark 5 HD. Have never needed the elevation travel on a hunting rifle. They are normally heavier/beefier obviously, and I prefer to stay out of the 30oz plus ATACRs etc. This one is lighter which is cool, maybe the extra tube helps with the optical design/space as well?
 
Top