Because it’s a pit worst than Tikka. And at the end Howa still be a rifle user force himself to love.Why do you call Howa a pit? The factory seconds stockys look like great deal.
I can only comment on my Tikka as I don’t know the savage.Looking for feedback.
I am trying to make a lightweight hunting rifle for whitetail still hunting in the woods (mostly quick shots). I don't plan to shoot beyond 200m, and I would like to get it close to 7 lb with scope, and x
close to $1,000.
I got a super cheap Savage 110 SA on sale with rebate $300 USD with bushnell Engage scoped included.
It has a sporter contour 22" barrel and the plastic bottom metal that seems weaker but is light.
I am thinking of:
1. Replacing the scope with a used Leupold ultralight 2.5x20mm (6.5 oz, net $170 after selling the Engage)
2. Replacing the rings with talley lightweight low rings (2 oz, $80)
3. Getting a Stocky's carbon fiber hunter stock, ideallyused (21 oz, $419 on sale)
4. Maybe DIY shortening the barrel down to around 18.5" (save 4 oz or so)
I think that the Savage 110 SA and 22" sporter 6.5 cm barrel are around 4.5 lbs together.
Feedback?
The Stocky's barrel only saves about 7 oz. over the plastic factory stock, and it is expensive (to me), but I am hoping that it will have improved function. But honestly, the rifle is more accurate than I am in the plastic stock. Are there better light, rigid stock options that don't cost more. Is it worth it?
No. By the time you add up cost of rifle plus cost of new stock etc it would be better to sell what you have to help fund what you really want.I have a stainless Ruger Hawkeye in 6.5 creedmoor. It has a 26” barrel. Would buying lightweight stock and having the barrel cut down so much or be cost effective? I guess I have lots of research to do.
Yes, you can start your own thread.(By the way, I am not trying to hijack this thread. I am new here and not sure if I am able to start new threads.)