If you've been routinely successful with scopes that have failed this ridiculous RSDT, the home town crew will tell you that you have no idea how to check zero, that you never check zero, that your scope has probably "failed" and you don't know it, blah, blah blah. Heard it myself when I posted that I've killed several hundred animals with Leupy, Athlon, and now have added Arken to the list. Biggest POS I've had were a couple of Swaro A, 1" tube scopes.
Admission that you don't think your scope could pass. That is helpful. No one has to want scopes that do pass. But, saying that is more useful than repetitively arguing that a scope is solid but refusing to back it up with a simple test.
Put differently, we have different definitions of what a scope should be capable of. That is fine, but the false equivalencies get old.
It follows a train like this.
Person A "A rifle needs to be sib 1.5 MAO to be good for hunting and most xxxx brand rifles can't do that."
Person B "My xxxx rifle works great for hunting, so you are wrong.
Person A "Can you show me the group."
Person B "I don't have time for that."
Person A "Ok, but I like accurate rifles for these reasons......."
Person B "Xxxx rifles are accurate, I kill a lot with them."
Person A " The ones I've had were not, can you show me a group."
Person B "I told you I don't have time for that."
Person A "Will I wan5 at least sub 1.5 MOA 30 round groups."
Person B "My xxxx rifle is great."