What are people’s thoughts on going lead free to prevent lead fragments contamination?
Thanks for your input.
The study always cited is the one done by the North Dakota Department of health.
What it found was a very, very insignificant increase of lead in blood levels from people who eat venison shot with lead bullets...as in .3 micrograms per deciliter. CDC lead levels of 10 micrograms per deciliter are said to cause problems in children. Not one of the people in the North Dakota study tested higher than 9.8.
IMO, if people think its a risk, go lead free. I believe that shooting controlled expansion lead bullets, not hitting heavy bones, and being careful with butchering practices...its a non-issue and insignificant.
There are a few posts like this on here.
We have the guys who say microscopic lead particles spread everywhere, folks who say don't eat the bloodshot meat, and folks who assign death to a thing that even touches the gut pile.
As a scientist, I always wonder what the desired result is behind studies and such. Most biologists I know are anti-hunting and pro anything to protect animals. They will even call roadside ditches sensitive habitat.
As a result my opinion is that fewer animals die from eating gut piles than say those giant electric turbines, so they really don't care about the birds but instead want to limit hunting.
It is also incorrect to try and compare metal levels in people to argue this point. We all have diff jobs, who still has lead-based paint in their homes, barns, places of employment, etc. Until you can compare a baseline prior to eating any game you can't compare that.
We'll have to agree to disagree.As a hunter and a scientist, who has read ALL the published literature out there on the topic, I see plenty of evidence against using lead if you don't need to. Both from a wildlife and cautious human health perspective.