Labradar and Gamin owners

[Weldor]

Can anyone tell after using both that there is a advantage one over the other, besides size? Just curious. I have used the Labradar a few times worked just fine, have not had a chance to use the Garmin yet.

 

[waspocrew]

Garmin all the way. Hated my Labradar- missed shots despite the external recoil trigger and all the other tricks. The app was terrible as well.

The Garmin has ran without a hiccup since day 1.

 

[Ucsdryder]

Had both. Not even close, the garmin is light years ahead. Horse drawn carriage vs a Toyota tundra. They both have wheels and get you from point a to b…other than that they have nothing in common.

 

[axeforce6]

I have the labradar with bluetooth and the garmin. The labradar isn't as easy to set up, but I have had great results with it. I prefer the garmin simply over size and setup alone. I'm probably going to sell my Labradar because I don't use it anymore. If you want to save some cheese get a labradar with bluetooth.

 

[lilharcher]

As mentioned…..no comparison. Garmin removes the “sensitivity” factor with my muzzleloader and certain rifles. Garmin measures every shot, 99% of the time (I have had no misses yet)……Labradar was like 85% rifle and 40% with my ML.

 

[TxLite]

I think the only real comparison would be the new labradar lx.

I haven’t used one but I’d still stick with the Garmin just because labradar should’ve released the LX years ago and missed the boat. My Garmin has been fantastic.

The old labradar is a dinosaur and was notorious for being a pain to set up and missing shots.