KUIU Super Down vs. Western Mountaineering Badger, 15-degree bags

Joined
Aug 10, 2019
Messages
2,580
Location
Lowcountry, SC
Good read on bags. I really like both my WM bags and my sleep has been better since getting some of the wider cut models, even though I’m a small guy.

I think where these bags are made is worth while to mention. While I know it does not matter to some,Im happy my bags carry the little label on the foot box

View attachment 161687

Same here. I'm a Western Mountaineerring bigot. After following this thread and reading every page I have come to realize that no matter how the tests go my current WM bag and all future bags will remain Western Mountaineering. I trust their experience, workmanship, materials, and judgment on where to build a bag.
 
OP
robby denning

robby denning

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
15,643
Location
SE Idaho
Same here. I'm a Western Mountaineerring bigot. After following this thread and reading every page I have come to realize that no matter how the tests go my current WM bag and all future bags will remain Western Mountaineering. I trust their experience, workmanship, materials, and judgment on where to build a bag.

And I’m sure that’s a safe bet.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Kevin_t

WKR
Rokslide Sponsor
Joined
Dec 2, 2012
Messages
1,162
Location
Colorado
Same here. I'm a Western Mountaineerring bigot. After following this thread and reading every page I have come to realize that no matter how the tests go my current WM bag and all future bags will remain Western Mountaineering. I trust their experience, workmanship, materials, and judgment on where to build a bag.

Plus 1 . And while I know they won’t do as well on the dunking test , I also think that test isn’t relevant to anyone taking the tiniest amount of precautions ... and recent discussions elsewhere lend me to believe WM is on the right side of the water resistant down debate ( and based on my own experience as well having had both )


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Kevin_t

WKR
Rokslide Sponsor
Joined
Dec 2, 2012
Messages
1,162
Location
Colorado
My personal experience was it wasn’t as lofty , especially coming out of the stuff sack . A few manufacturers have moved away from it .Apparently it can wash out and when it does wash out the down is in worse shape than if it had never been treated


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

SgtTanner

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Feb 1, 2020
Messages
239
My personal experience was it wasn’t as lofty , especially coming out of the stuff sack . A few manufacturers have moved away from it .Apparently it can wash out and when it does wash out the down is in worse shape than if it had never been treated


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Makes sense, thanks for the explanation!
 
Joined
Aug 10, 2019
Messages
2,580
Location
Lowcountry, SC
My personal experience was it wasn’t as lofty , especially coming out of the stuff sack . A few manufacturers have moved away from it .Apparently it can wash out and when it does wash out the down is in worse shape than if it had never been treated


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's also the opinion of WM, that artificial water resistance treatment removes the natural oils from the down. I trust them more than any other bag builder. I could be wrong, but they are experts and I put my trust in them.
 
OP
robby denning

robby denning

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
15,643
Location
SE Idaho
OK guys time for the soak test.

VERY UNSCIENTIFIC

We’re supposed to have about an eighth of an inch of rain over the next few hours. So I’ve laid the bags out side-by-side, and put a little rain gauge next to them. I did the best I could to close the tops with that stick so the water doesn’t run right down in the bags. I’ll give it a few hours then open them up and see what happened.

You’ll also notice I put two trays of water under each of the foot boxes with about a quarter inch of water in each one. We’ll see if that puddle simulation causes a soak-through in the foot box.
93f7f621c6ade1e4aa9485265ea69ca9.jpg

ffee69277ff640adca5491ca24112f5b.jpg

b68d6689b3c49f07072a1d27fa95b5e0.jpg

2920a410ee5e051bbbbec99546ae7103.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

sneaky

"DADDY"
Joined
Feb 1, 2014
Messages
10,112
Location
ID
OK guys time for the soak test.

VERY UNSCIENTIFIC

We’re supposed to have about an eighth of an inch of rain over the next few hours. So I’ve laid the bags out side-by-side, and put a little rain gauge next to them. I did the best I could to close the tops with that stick so the water doesn’t run right down in the bags. I’ll give it a few hours then open them up and see what happened.

You’ll also notice I put two trays of water under each of the foot boxes with about a quarter inch of water in each one. We’ll see if that puddle simulation causes a soak-through in the foot box.
93f7f621c6ade1e4aa9485265ea69ca9.jpg

ffee69277ff640adca5491ca24112f5b.jpg

b68d6689b3c49f07072a1d27fa95b5e0.jpg

2920a410ee5e051bbbbec99546ae7103.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You're like the Bill Nye the Science Guy of sleeping bag tests

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 
OP
robby denning

robby denning

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
15,643
Location
SE Idaho
The soak test is done! Hot off the presses... and there was a winner

Please remember this is a simple NOT SCIENTIFIC TEST that may or may not replicate actual circumstances that can lead to a wet bag.

I will say, though, that modern down bags are nothing like those I grew up around.
 

sneaky

"DADDY"
Joined
Feb 1, 2014
Messages
10,112
Location
ID
Man, same day video posting. We're spoiled. That should answer the questions about whether guys need to spend extra money and haul extra weight for a Gore Tex shell on a WM bag. Very few locations would warrant that.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 

zacattack

WKR
Joined
Aug 23, 2018
Messages
1,392
Location
Michigan
The soak test is done! Hot off the presses... and there was a winner

Please remember this is a simple NOT SCIENTIFIC TEST that may or may not replicate actual circumstances that can lead to a wet bag.

I will say, though, that modern down bags are nothing like those I grew up around.

That was pretty sweet. Makes sense though, I don’t know what feathers are treated with but if you’ve ever handled a goose you know that those are some oily SOB’s. And all that oil is fantastic at water resistance.
 

Kevin_t

WKR
Rokslide Sponsor
Joined
Dec 2, 2012
Messages
1,162
Location
Colorado
The WM shell of the series the badger is is technically waterproof though water can get through stitch holes but I suppose you could fix that if desired .

Good test @Robby . I’m usually critical of tests that are not super relevant but that is relevant and a solid video . IE ... you really can sleep under a misty a tarp in a WM bag and get misting and stuff and it isn’t a big deal.

IMO , the shells on WM bags are better than most at creating a comfortable bag .


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

SgtTanner

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Feb 1, 2020
Messages
239
The soak test is done! Hot off the presses... and there was a winner

Please remember this is a simple NOT SCIENTIFIC TEST that may or may not replicate actual circumstances that can lead to a wet bag.

I will say, though, that modern down bags are nothing like those I grew up around.
I think you just made my mind up for me, Robby. Is this a standard WM Badger, or one with the overfill? I guess that’s my next decision.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2016
Messages
1,894
Location
El Dorado HIlls
I look at it like any other DWR treatment. Great when it's new, but leaves you compromised once it wears off.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Yeah when I called Feathered Friends and discussed the 900fill they use they said in all their testing treated down wasn't as lofty and which wasn't as warm long term. They did say the only advantage they found was once the down was wet it did dry faster.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2016
Messages
1,894
Location
El Dorado HIlls
The badger uses the Microfiber fabric which is 20d. It is obviously more weather resistant than the WM Extremelite fabric, but has anyone here done testing or real world wet conditions with the Extremelite fabric?

I had the WM Alpinelite, which uses the extremelite, and loved it; but only had it in very wet condition on two nights which is not a big enough sampling size to know for sure. I and am either going to get another one or the Badger. Even though the Extremelite fabric is 12d i'm wondering if it is more than sufficient for most lower 48 hunts in dryer climates such as CO highcountry.
 

Kevin_t

WKR
Rokslide Sponsor
Joined
Dec 2, 2012
Messages
1,162
Location
Colorado
I forget the exact specs but the extreme light is 1200 I think which is still as high as many tents. The micro is higher . What I think most people will notice between the fabrics is the microfiber breathes a fair amount better so it feels more dry inside which probably makes a wider comfort range ( at least in my experience bags that breath better I’ve generally though had a larger comfort range as they were less clammy )


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
OP
robby denning

robby denning

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
15,643
Location
SE Idaho
I think you just made my mind up for me, Robby. Is this a standard WM Badger, or one with the overfill? I guess that’s my next decision.

I don’t know! I just do what Ryan says and he said “test these bags!”

How could I tell if it’s “...overfill”?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Top