thinhorn_AK
"DADDY"
Thanks for all the input guys, keep it coming!
I THINK I am a standard size and shape...I have yet to get an exact measurement of my torso but I am 6'2" with a "normal" back. I do like how Kifaru makes their frames precisely for one's individual dimensions, but I'm sure Stone Glacier frames would fit me well, I don't think I'm too much of an oddball.
A couple follow-up questions:
1)I was not aware that Kifaru was planning on releasing a new frame as well as some new bags soon. Does anyone have any more information on this or any links even? This certainly could affect my decision if its all ultra-light stuff (I think the weight of SG is a one of their huge selling points, at least in my eyes).
2)Do you guys who have owned bags from both companies notice any difference in toughness, craftsmanship, or overall durability? As I stated, this pack will be used frequently and for multiple applications, and if I'm going to spend $600+ on a pack, I want it to be able to handle my abuses.
Thanks again or the input guys, I appreciate how active these forums are.
In my opinion the weight IS THE thing stone glacier has going for them. But that being said, if I were you, I’d wait on the new kifaru frame, if it’s really awesome, I’ll likely buy one, I love my 28” tactical frame but if they make something that compares to stone glacier it will be hard not to buy it.
After owning both, I have not noticed any differences in durability but I haven’t used the SG as much as the kifaru, and even the kifaru only has about 40 days of use on it.
I honestly don’t know which one id keep if I was only going to keep one pack, I love the stone glacier in regards to weight and layout but the kifaru fulcrum just works so well for hauling heavy loads out. My main plan for the SG Solo is for shorter sheep and goat hunts lasting 3-4 days or less.
One cool thing about the new kifaru frame is that I could still us the fulcrum but drop 2lbs from the empty pack weight.