Is glass quality in scopes actually a factor?

Ya this post was not worded well on my part. Yes I am fully aware there is a glass difference between a $30 walmart scope and a NX8.. I am also fully aware that FOV, eyebox durability and tracking are top priorities. I talking comparing say the SWFA and Maven or NX8 or Ten Mile.. I can not tell enough of a difference in any situation to buy one over the other.. The guys that can tell that X brand glass is .01% better than Y brand are either lying or relying mentally too much on BS that does not matter.
 
Curious as to why ZeroStop made the list? Personal preference? I thought is was super important until the class but now I have them all set to go 3-4 mils below zero...
I’ve often wondered why folks set their optic to go below zero. What is the use case behind this?
 
I’ve often wondered why folks set their optic to go below zero. What is the use case behind this?
I do it because I shoot different loads on my .223. One ammo is set to Rev 2/ 0 elevation and Rev 1/ 0 windage. Second ammo is Rev 1/ 3 elevation.
 
Ya this post was not worded well on my part. Yes I am fully aware there is a glass difference between a $30 walmart scope and a NX8.. I am also fully aware that FOV, eyebox durability and tracking are top priorities. I talking comparing say the SWFA and Maven or NX8 or Ten Mile.. I can not tell enough of a difference in any situation to buy one over the other.. The guys that can tell that X brand glass is .01% better than Y brand are either lying or relying mentally too much on BS that does not matter.
I'm not sure I agree with this. I can see a difference in SWFA and some of those you mentioned. It's not anything that would prevent a guy from making a kill, but there is s difference in glass quality to my eyes. I am not sure anyone in this thread, atleast, stated anything to the contrary.

Your last sentence seems like you are trying to confirm your position. Obviously seeing a difference by .01% would be next to impossible and I suspect you knew that.

The new scope that S2H is releasing, clearly shows, in the puctures released thus far, that it's resolution is better than the ones it has been compared against. I'm not sure of % better, but even by Forms account, better. Why not have the best glass you can afford, if every other important scope quality has been achieved?
 
Why not have the best glass you can afford, if every other important scope quality has been achieved?
i have had some the best glass made in rifles scopes. Tanget Theta, ZeroComp, Kahles ect. i sold them & use a SWFA 3-9 on my primary hunting rifle. i have zero regrets about selling all of them
 
i have had some the best glass made in rifles scopes. Tanget Theta, ZeroComp, Kahles ect. i sold them & use a SWFA 3-9 on my primary hunting rifle. i have zero regrets about selling all of them
But those scopes don't have all the other attributes you look for in a scope, do they?
 
The more important question really is, Where do you rank the importance of scope qualities? (Durability, reliability, weight, size, glass quality, turrets, features, Fov) This is where the lines become blurred and personal preference enters the debate.
 
But those scopes don't have all the other attributes you look for in a scope, do they?
they do not, i also have had the the ATACR, NX8. all of them. i have a problem lol. glass quality at the end of the day became less important over time to me. Also people get real queer on "feel how clicky my turrets are" especially the TT group :ROFLMAO:
 
The more important question really is, Where do you rank the importance of scope qualities? (Durability, reliability, weight, size, glass quality, turrets, features, Fov) This is where the lines become blurred and personal preference enters the debate.
you almost put them in order
 
IMO the highest quality scope glass is visably better. I’ve done side by side comparisons with my Khales vs others in low light at 200 yards. I was looking at very small items as a comparison …not deer sized game. However if was a small opening when hunting it might make a difference. Only you can make the call if it’s enough for you to justify the $$$
 
I'm not sure I agree with this. I can see a difference in SWFA and some of those you mentioned. It's not anything that would prevent a guy from making a kill, but there is s difference in glass quality to my eyes. I am not sure anyone in this thread, atleast, stated anything to the contrary.

Your last sentence seems like you are trying to confirm your position. Obviously seeing a difference by .01% would be next to impossible and I suspect you knew that.

The new scope that S2H is releasing, clearly shows, in the puctures released thus far, that it's resolution is better than the ones it has been compared against. I'm not sure of % better, but even by Forms account, better. Why not have the best glass you can afford, if every other important scope quality has been achieved?
I'm not trying to confirm my point at all. I'm just saying for me there is a point of diminishing returns. I honestly have not seen the advantage of say a ZCO vs a SWFA (comparing glass only) that would limit my end goal. Maybe its like boots and everyone is different. I just cant tell that much of a difference and if there is any I cant analytically calculate a gain or loss of one vs another in field hunting big game animals.. To ME its like guys that do runout on loaded ammo.. I cant shoot the difference nor require the accuracy improvement of doing this..

My premise is glass quality past say a SWFA or maven or SHV has little to no calculable advantage and is a mute point when applied to big game field shooting.
 
I don’t see any scope beyond a VX-2 or Burris FFII making or breaking a shot opportunity. See a difference, yes. Can aim though.
 
These posts got me thinking.

A SWFA is an expensive scope.

On Rokslide we tend to think of SWFA as a cheap optic but for most (maybe 90%?) of hunters the cost is out of reach or has no perceived value.

We split hairs here, but when you meet people in the field, they usually have random $100-250 scopes from a retail counter.

Does anyone have stats on average dollars spent per rifle on optics?

High end optic encounters are so infrequent here in my AO that I can remember them:
- dude with a huge S&B, couldn't stop talking about it...not optics in general, just his.
- dude with a high-end Leica scope with a random family connection to that brand thru a sales rep.

Form struck a chord in me with his belief that the scope is merely a sighting device. We're not bird watching.
I couldn't listen to or read accounts of "blue glass, purple hue, warm/cool, great color fidelity, etc." seriously after I began to think about scopes that way. List a scope on the classifieds here and you get to meet all the dudes that value these things.

Another random thought is I believe many folks seeking higher end, high magnification optics are using them to glass in lieu of binos. Makes me cringe.
100% on all of this.

I listen to the Vortex podcast quite a bit, just because the topics are so varied. They have sight in days before deer season at Vortex Edge. He said the Crossfire is the scope they sell the most of during those days. I'm sure the Crossfire line is their #1 selling line, by far.

Another interesting take from one of their podcasts was a hunt Ryan was on in Idaho. He's glassing with Razor UHD's..... His guide was using Diamondback's and Ryan NEVER spotted game first.

I also think the same thing about people using high mag scopes as glassing devices in lieu of binoculars and spotting scopes. Except it's not random. Back in the 90's, the Walmart that I worked at, we were almost like a mini sportsmans's warehouse in the gun area. We sold more guns than all of the other Walmart's in the area combined. We were right on the edge of the rural area. We could order anything someone wanted from the distributors. We sold some very nice factory rifles and handguns over the years, but the #1 selling "nice" scope we had was the Bushnell Banner 6-18 for $119. #2 was the Simmons ATV 4.5-14x40 for $149. We had several Leupold and Burris scopes in the case too, but people said it was too much money for a scope. Lots of people who bought those mentioned not needing binoculars anymore. My good friend runs a private 200 yd range at this house. You can buy time in 3-hour slots. I spend a lot of time down there, even just hanging out. I hear people saying all the time about using their riflescope as a spotter.

Over the last 32 years of hunting and shooting, I've run into WAY more folks with big box package rifles/scopes in the field and at the range than I have with people having semi-custom, custom, or even just high-end factory rifles. Don't even mention high end scopes. I mean it's 100 to 1. Or like stated above, nice rifles with lower priced scopes. 25 year old Winchester Featherweights or Remington BDL's with Bushnell Sportview or Tasco World Class scopes.

Honestly, the only people I personally know that spend more than $150 on a scope is the little group of 6 or 8 of us that all hang out at that private range, and a few other guys that shoot on the range. So maybe 12 guys? Then folks in the forums.

If all you're doing is hunting the back 40 for 4 or 5 days once a year and box of 20 rounds lasts 3 or 4 years.... you don't NEED more than a $150 scope. And that's what the majority of hunters are doing.
 
Back
Top