Interpreting load development data and next steps

Ztm91

FNG
Joined
Jan 27, 2024
Messages
63
I am new to reloading (and honestly shooting) and am working on my first load development project.

I ordered a new 280 AI that will be my primary focus, but for now I am working on my current rifle which is a 6.5 creedmoor, Savage 110 Trail Hunter with an 18” barrel. Speed really isn’t my concern here but for comparison it shoots factory 143 ELDX at an average of 2553 fps.

The rounds below were loaded with once fired hornaday brass since I have a ton of it, Winchester large rifle primers, 143gr ELDX, and IMR 4350.

My questions revolve around interpreting data collected and next steps, realizing there are many variables, many of which are human related and hard to quantify such as:
- All powder charges weighed individually on a balance beam scale.
- I never touched a rifle before until July 2025 so my skill level is not extremely high.
- These strings were shot outdoors off a bipod, in freezing temps and 15+ mph winds.
- The highest accuracy loads were on one side of the target in a vertical line so I’m not sure if even placement on the target sheet played a role.
- Lower quality chronograph.

Rounds were fired in five shot groups going from lowest to highest charge and repeating to try to eliminate some charges being fired after more practice rounds essentially. Most groups seemed to have a flier that was almost certainly shooter error. So just for visualization I graphed the 3 shot group but also the closest two shots in the group.

My thoughts are to shoot several 5 round groups with 40gr, 40.8, and 41.2 as a better accuracy comparison. But I am curious to see what more experienced reloaders and shooters would suggest.


IMG_4600.png
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4596.jpeg
    IMG_4596.jpeg
    740.5 KB · Views: 8
I am new to reloading (and honestly shooting) and am working on my first load development project.

I ordered a new 280 AI that will be my primary focus, but for now I am working on my current rifle which is a 6.5 creedmoor, Savage 110 Trail Hunter with an 18” barrel. Speed really isn’t my concern here but for comparison it shoots factory 143 ELDX at an average of 2553 fps.

The rounds below were loaded with once fired hornaday brass since I have a ton of it, Winchester large rifle primers, 143gr ELDX, and IMR 4350.

My questions revolve around interpreting data collected and next steps, realizing there are many variables, many of which are human related and hard to quantify such as:
- All powder charges weighed individually on a balance beam scale.
- I never touched a rifle before until July 2025 so my skill level is not extremely high.
- These strings were shot outdoors off a bipod, in freezing temps and 15+ mph winds.
- The highest accuracy loads were on one side of the target in a vertical line so I’m not sure if even placement on the target sheet played a role.
- Lower quality chronograph.

Rounds were fired in five shot groups going from lowest to highest charge and repeating to try to eliminate some charges being fired after more practice rounds essentially. Most groups seemed to have a flier that was almost certainly shooter error. So just for visualization I graphed the 3 shot group but also the closest two shots in the group.

My thoughts are to shoot several 5 round groups with 40gr, 40.8, and 41.2 as a better accuracy comparison. But I am curious to see what more experienced reloaders and shooters would suggest.


View attachment 1009493

I would stop doing .2gr jumps, it’s a waste of time and resources. Go with .4-.5gr jumps the reality is most people can’t shoot good enough in real world conditions won’t see any benefit from small adjustments. In looking at your data the only one I would try again would be the 41.6 load. Load and shoot 10-20 and see what your group looks like. If it’s not acceptable then pick a new bullet or powder (only 1 at a time) and start over.
Do a search on RS for Painless Load Development for more information.
 
Back
Top