lefthandedasian
FNG
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2024
- Messages
- 77
I've been toying with the idea of getting some image stabilizing binos in lieu of my current tripod and maven 18x56 combo for backpacking. I'm not a huge fan of looking through spotters and at least one guy in our group has one which is why I opted to go with big binos.
Does the glass quality matter that much that it offsets the weight penalty enough to where you'll find more game and have less eye strain with the better glass? Or are the image stabilizing binos close enough in glass quality that shedding the weight of the tripod would be more beneficial?
Obviously this is person and place dependant, but I'd love to hear people's experiences with both and whether or not the image quality outweighs (pun in tended) the weight penalty of the combo.
For reference, I've only been hunting for a little over 4 years so my field experience is still pretty minimal compared to most. I live and hunt in the PNW where we do the high buck hunt and our group usually tries for one out of state hunt per season in the neighboring Idaho, Montana, Wyoming areas where we usually backpack in a few miles.
Thanks in advance
Does the glass quality matter that much that it offsets the weight penalty enough to where you'll find more game and have less eye strain with the better glass? Or are the image stabilizing binos close enough in glass quality that shedding the weight of the tripod would be more beneficial?
Obviously this is person and place dependant, but I'd love to hear people's experiences with both and whether or not the image quality outweighs (pun in tended) the weight penalty of the combo.
For reference, I've only been hunting for a little over 4 years so my field experience is still pretty minimal compared to most. I live and hunt in the PNW where we do the high buck hunt and our group usually tries for one out of state hunt per season in the neighboring Idaho, Montana, Wyoming areas where we usually backpack in a few miles.
Thanks in advance