Customweld
WKR
The IFG Commission is starting the NR tag reduction proposal meetings this week.
It seems to me, this is really pushing it on time.
Like Rob5589 is saying, only days remain. It will be interesting to see how this shakes out.
Sounds like no more general deer for non res, only residents. Now you'll have to pick a zone for the deer tag, same as elk. With people hunting various zones, it will be interesting to see the caps. It may take a few years of doing it that way before they get a good handle on numbers.I could care less about elk. It’s already in zones.
What I am most curious about is non resident deer hunters and how this will effect hunter distribution. Is the general deer tag gone for non residents??? I hope so? Is it going to be unit by unit tags? Or managed by zones?
This is a GIANT change in regards to deer. And it has been barely talked about.
What constitutes as “participation”? Many deer hunters participate in hunting multiple units, in multiple zones. This is the main problem they are trying to address as I understand it,
I applaud IDFG on this. The GS deer tag has to include management of hunters.
If I was a non-resident hunter I would be paying very close attention.
I can’t believe it’s not bigger news. There are going to be a pile of non res deer hunters very upset and I’m going to enjoy a 50% reduction in hunter numbers in my favorite units
Makes it seem like almost all the other Western States.I agree this is a huge change that is going to surprise a lot of people. It will have a really big impact on some units for sure. A one unit only tag sure changes the perspective of an Idaho deer tag for me and I am sure a lot of other folks.
Makes it seem like almost all the other Western States.
Its time for Idaho to quit being the “WalMart of the West” for non-res tags. This is a step in the right direction.
I agree 100% it will be intresting to see how they roll this out. Im imagining based on the commission brief that it will have capped and uncapped units with the overall quota unchanged. It will definitely redistribute non residents from the popular capped units into other units. I see no way that this doesn't create more pressure in some units while reducing pressure in others which may solve the "crowding" issue at least for awhile.As I sit here and ponder this. There are a couple of units I hunt that will probably have increase in non resident hunters. It will be very interesting to see how this shakes out.
The commission brief says exactly that, every game management unit for deer will have caps, zones for elk, with the statewide total being the same it has for 30 years.I agree 100% it will be intresting to see how they roll this out. Im imagining based on the commission brief that it will have capped and uncapped units with the overall quota unchanged. It will definitely redistribute non residents from the popular capped units into other units. I see no way that this doesn't create more pressure in some units while reducing pressure in others which may solve the "crowding" issue at least for awhile.
I can't imagine the whole quota being divided into specific caps for every single unit. I just don't see there being demand for expensive nonresident 2x2 tags.
Financial impact will be minimal, they raised prices to help balance it out.I’m curious what the economic impact will be to the IDFG?
I’d also like to know how many non residents actually hunt more than one unit. I’m guessing most guys come over for one week and hunt within a 10 mile radius, concurrent with the elk tag they also hold.