I hate muzzle brakes!

[K9kodi]

I love my suppressor on the ones that get used often. For my personal use and opinion, for the one shot I take at a deer it’s not worth the extra length and weight, being as I bought the rifle for its weight reduction. I’d be in a diff school of though if I were shooting comps w it for sure.

 

[butcherboy]

I’ll never own a suppressor. Only have one rifle with a brake on it and I really enjoy shooting it. The rest don’t have brakes and everything is just fine.

 

[Brontosaurus]

I’ll never own a suppressor. Only have one rifle with a brake on it and I really enjoy shooting it. The rest don’t have brakes and everything is just fine.

Don't knock it til ya try it!

 

[butcherboy]

Don't knock it til ya try it!

I’ll never try it unless someone lets me shoot their rifle with one. I didn’t knock it, it’s just not for me and I don’t have a problem with anyone if they shoot with one. I’m just not going to spend that kind of money for one. Already have enough invested in rifle, scope, ammo, and other gear. I don’t go out and shoot a lot unless myself or my kids are getting ready for a hunt and then ear muffs are just fine. If we shoot a lot then it’s usually .22’s.

 

[K9kodi]

I def could have taken the money I spent on my suppressor and stamp and muzzle device and used it elsewhere. It’s really a huge cool factor as far as I’m concerned. I’m happy I got one, and it is fun. But it’s pointless on my hunting rifles

 

[ianpadron]

I love brakes. If someone else at the range has one, I leave. If someone else shows up while I'm shooting a braked rifle, I swap out to a suppressed rifle.

While in the field (away from concrete, metal, etc) I don't find brakes obnoxious at all, and they are superior in maintaining sight picture on anything larger than a 6.5CM (at least for me)

If suppressors didn't weigh .5-.75# and add 6" to a barrel I'd have them on everything, but that ain't the case so I'll continue to use both