Mike7
WKR
I don't think anyone is saying that the "potential" inefficient use of tax dollars has anything to do with first responders, but rather a "possible" lack of creative solutions in some settings, solutions which could save money while maybe still getting the job done without jeopardizing safety.
For routine daily medical calls which make up the vast majority for some dept's, maybe a 3 man crew (1 paramedic) in a $30,000 van assisting the private contractor ambulance as needed (with the additional crew members manning the engine back at the station) rather than putting all of the miles on a ladder truck, which costs at least 10x's as much to maintain and replace?
In most doctor's offices for example, no more than 4 people including the patient can usually fit in the room, and you have a clear history over the phone at dispatch that the ladder truck is not needed.
I am guessing that there are other factors to consider by fire dept admins, but I can also see how the tax payer finds this potentially very wasteful when voting on bonds.
For routine daily medical calls which make up the vast majority for some dept's, maybe a 3 man crew (1 paramedic) in a $30,000 van assisting the private contractor ambulance as needed (with the additional crew members manning the engine back at the station) rather than putting all of the miles on a ladder truck, which costs at least 10x's as much to maintain and replace?
In most doctor's offices for example, no more than 4 people including the patient can usually fit in the room, and you have a clear history over the phone at dispatch that the ladder truck is not needed.
I am guessing that there are other factors to consider by fire dept admins, but I can also see how the tax payer finds this potentially very wasteful when voting on bonds.