H-S Precision stocks?

[GeorgeShaw]

Thinking of replacing the zytel stock on my Ruger All Weather. I don't want some flimsy, cheap stock. Has anyone have hands on experience with an H-S? I hate the thought of spending $500+ and not liking it. Thanks

 

[Fred@Exterra]

I’m surprised to hear about someone getting rid of a zytel stock… they are pretty sought after (even though they are ugly, heavy & uncomfortable . )

The HS line of stocks are not particularly strong or rigid, they haven’t really kept up with technology. I believe they are still using a self-skinning urethane foam with an aluminum bedding block. Better stocks are using either a hand laid carbon fiber or fiberglass shell with a foam filling. This is way better structurally and lighter weight.

On the premium side, I would look at McMillan. For a little better pricing, Stocky’s is making some pretty good stocks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[GeorgeShaw]

I’m surprised to hear about someone getting rid of a zytel stock… they are pretty sought after (even though they are ugly, heavy & uncomfortable . )

The HS line of stocks are not particularly strong or rigid, they haven’t really kept up with technology. I believe they are still using a self-skinning urethane foam with an aluminum bedding block. Better stocks are using either a hand laid carbon fiber or fiberglass shell with a foam filling. This is way better structurally and lighter weight.

On the premium side, I would look at McMillan. For a little better pricing, Stocky’s is making some pretty good stocks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I like the Zytel stock, but it's not easily adapt to using a bipod. I'll keep it along with the factory barrel which I also replaced. I'll check out the stocks mentioned.

 

[GeorgeShaw]

I’m surprised to hear about someone getting rid of a zytel stock… they are pretty sought after (even though they are ugly, heavy & uncomfortable . )

The HS line of stocks are not particularly strong or rigid, they haven’t really kept up with technology. I believe they are still using a self-skinning urethane foam with an aluminum bedding block. Better stocks are using either a hand laid carbon fiber or fiberglass shell with a foam filling. This is way better structurally and lighter weight.

On the premium side, I would look at McMillan. For a little better pricing, Stocky’s is making some pretty good stocks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Our stocks are made of a dense polyurethane foam, Kevlar, woven fiberglass, and unidirectional carbon fiber all surrounding a 7075 aluminum bedding block. This is from H*S page. I checked the two others, but don't see anything for Ruger

 

[BuckSmasher]

Thinking of replacing the zytel stock on my Ruger All Weather. I don't want some flimsy, cheap stock. Has anyone have hands on experience with an H-S? I hate the thought of spending $500+ and not liking it. Thanks

I have a HS precision stock on my Ruger M77. I like it but don't LOVE it. It is plenty stiff, that criticism isn't accurate at all. But it IS heavier than one would probably like in a custom stock. I have heard that a good gunsmith can custom inlet other stocks to fit Ruger but only off the shelf selection I remember seeing when I was looking was HS precision and Boyd's. I have seen people hollow out and highly customize Boyd's stocks and do some really cool stuff with them.

My rifle was an all weather from the 2000's that didn't come with the zytel stock. THAT stock was trash. I could move it with my hands. I looked at getting zytel stock secondhand but they are just too ugly. HS precision looks much better.

Really like the m77 as a commercial mauser action. You give up a couple oz in weight vs modern bolt actions but gain functionality and reliability that I value more. Plus I shoot un-braked and a few extra oz's within reason help recoil anyway.

 

[Eric Burden]

I have a few H&S stocks and always have performed very well. They also do a Military discount which is REALLY GOOD

 

[StupidLightweight]

They're good stocks, not the lightest or sexiest, but stiff and well built. H-S is a big upgrade over the factory stock.

 

[Turkeytider]

The Savage Model 12 LRPV that I purchased several years ago comes with an HS Precision stock. Have been VERY satisfied with it. It’s a tank ( heavy ! ) , but that’s exactly what’s needed with a target gun shooting off the bench. Solid as a rock, at least in my experience.
Would not hesitate to have another.

 

[Kyguy]

HS was never known for lightweight stocks but recently they're the stock of choice on the new Kimber Mtn Ascent and on the Howa Superlight. What did they change to make the stocks so light for those rifles? And I wonder if that change will transfer over to their aftermarket stocks? The two stocks I've had for a Remington 700 short and a Howa/Vanguard short action were both just over 38 oz bare. The last few Boyd's walnut stocks I bought for various actions were 29.5-30.55 oz.

 

[LaHunter]

I’m surprised to hear about someone getting rid of a zytel stock… they are pretty sought after (even though they are ugly, heavy & uncomfortable . )

The HS line of stocks are not particularly strong or rigid, they haven’t really kept up with technology. I believe they are still using a self-skinning urethane foam with an aluminum bedding block. Better stocks are using either a hand laid carbon fiber or fiberglass shell with a foam filling. This is way better structurally and lighter weight.

On the premium side, I would look at McMillan. For a little better pricing, Stocky’s is making some pretty good stocks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This is not accurate. HS Precision stocks are very rigid and strong. Just not light weight.

 

[GeorgeShaw]

I have a HS precision stock on my Ruger M77. I like it but don't LOVE it. It is plenty stiff, that criticism isn't accurate at all. But it IS heavier than one would probably like in a custom stock. I have heard that a good gunsmith can custom inlet other stocks to fit Ruger but only off the shelf selection I remember seeing when I was looking was HS precision and Boyd's. I have seen people hollow out and highly customize Boyd's stocks and do some really cool stuff with them.

My rifle was an all weather from the 2000's that didn't come with the zytel stock. THAT stock was trash. I could move it with my hands. I looked at getting zytel stock secondhand but they are just too ugly. HS precision looks much better.

Really like the m77 as a commercial mauser action. You give up a couple oz in weight vs modern bolt actions but gain functionality and reliability that I value more. Plus I shoot un-braked and a few extra oz's within reason help recoil anyway.

I definitely want to stay with a composite rather than wood. I like having a gun that's not afraid of bad weather. I won't mind an extra pound from the zytel, as it's pretty light anyway. I'm going to get my calipers, and compare my barrel to their dimensions first. Also going to call and ask about their return policy. Thanks

 

[wildwilderness]

I have a Ruger M77 that had a zytel stock- I hated that stock! so uncomfortable and felt like a boat paddle. I put a HS precision on it and feels so much better. Way less noticeable recoil and very accurate. I think HS is good for the money. If you want to compare to another option look at Bell & Carlson.

Not fair to compare to a Manners, McMillian, AG Composites etc. since they are different price points and materials.

 

[Steve300xcw]

I like the Zytel stock, but it's not easily adapt to using a bipod.

Why? I'd sink a sling stud into it for the bipod and party on.

 

[hunter2405]

Thinking of replacing the zytel stock on my Ruger All Weather. I don't want some flimsy, cheap stock. Has anyone have hands on experience with an H-S? I hate the thought of spending $500+ and not liking it. Thanks

They are making a great stock but if you order from them , It will take eight weeks to get it !!!!

 

[Tmac]

I have HS Precision stocks on several rifles. For a traditional stock I really like them. I’ve had no issues with stiffness on my stocks from 1997 or 2024. They have noticeably helped accuracy on a couple.