Glass from ball head or shoot from pan/fluid head

Joined
May 18, 2021
Messages
343
What would you rather take on a glassing heavy mule deer gun hunt? Ball or fluid/pan head? Would like to have the ability to shoot from my tripod.
Not counting the new tricer with both.
 

hereinaz

WKR
Rokslide Sponsor
Joined
Dec 21, 2016
Messages
4,003
Location
Arizona
IMO Glass from a ball head. Mine isn’t that much heavier than micro pans. The benefit I have to shoot over brush with tripod is too great. I also lose weight by leaving the bipod at home. My “heavy” loadout can be equal or less than others.

If you don’t want the full benefit it doesn’t matter as much. Depends on how/what your hunt looks like.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8524.jpeg
    IMG_8524.jpeg
    428.3 KB · Views: 18
  • IMG_8229.jpeg
    IMG_8229.jpeg
    305.4 KB · Views: 18

JohnB

WKR
Joined
Aug 28, 2019
Messages
505
I've been pretty happy glassing from my Aziak Frontcountry since it is possible to use as a pan head. I have not shot off of it yet so can't offer any feedback there.
 
OP
G
Joined
May 18, 2021
Messages
343
I've been pretty happy glassing from my Aziak Frontcountry since it is possible to use as a pan head. I have not shot off of it yet so can't offer any feedback there.
Glad to hear. The FrontCountry tripod and head have my attention.
 

TaperPin

WKR
Joined
Jul 12, 2023
Messages
3,767
I’ve never found a fluid head to be any advantage - I’m not looking for game while the scope is moving - move a little, look for things while scope is still, move a little, look for things while scope is still, etc.

Now, if I was into making videos I’d want a fluid head, but that’s different.
 

Dioni A

Basque Assassin
Shoot2HuntU
Joined
Mar 29, 2016
Messages
1,823
Location
Nampa, Idaho
I would strongly argue against glassing from a ball head. If all you’re doing is putting your binoculars on it that’s fine but if you do much with a spotting scope, it leaves a lot to be desired. I’ve shot a bunch off of a pan head and it’s less of a compromise than glassing off of a ball head.
 
Joined
Dec 13, 2017
Messages
707
Location
SE AZ
As long as you have a ball head with pan, you’re not giving up a whole lot glassing with one.

I spend 15 minutes glassing the mountains by my house almost every single day, and at least 4x 2hr sessions a month rambling around throughout the year. Most of the time it’s with a Leofoto MH-40 or Aziak backcountry ball head. Only on occasion do I switch to a pan head, and it’s almost always for weight savings—the Wiser Precision head is a favorite of mine.
 

TaperPin

WKR
Joined
Jul 12, 2023
Messages
3,767
I would strongly argue against glassing from a ball head. If all you’re doing is putting your binoculars on it that’s fine but if you do much with a spotting scope, it leaves a lot to be desired. I’ve shot a bunch off of a pan head and it’s less of a compromise than glassing off of a ball head.
Curious what you found objectionable about the ball head? Sticky side to side movement or something else?
 

zfeldma

FNG
Joined
Jan 17, 2025
Messages
4
I like that the mini fluid heads move easily, then stay rock solid while glassing with a finger tip. Smallrig makes a nice little one that is cheap. Smaller than the little sirui one.
 

Dioni A

Basque Assassin
Shoot2HuntU
Joined
Mar 29, 2016
Messages
1,823
Location
Nampa, Idaho
Curious what you found objectionable about the ball head? Sticky side to side movement or something else?
If you’re trying to track a moving animal through thick cover it’s a disaster. Micro adjustments are significantly more difficult and I’ve never seen anyone find targets as quickly with one. I’ve killed a pile of big deer and never shot one from a tripod. I’ve looked at every single one of them with my spotter and multiple have been time critical.
Why on earth would you optimize a piece of gear for its least likely use case?
 

waspocrew

WKR
Joined
Apr 2, 2022
Messages
1,060
Location
MT
Tried glassing from a ball head, hated it. A pan head is way better for glassing in my experience.
 

TaperPin

WKR
Joined
Jul 12, 2023
Messages
3,767
If you’re trying to track a moving animal through thick cover it’s a disaster. Micro adjustments are significantly more difficult and I’ve never seen anyone find targets as quickly with one. I’ve killed a pile of big deer and never shot one from a tripod. I’ve looked at every single one of them with my spotter and multiple have been time critical.
Why on earth would you optimize a piece of gear for its least likely use case?
I guess I can’t relate - never had a problem tracking, fine tuning or finding animals with a ball head, even side by side with a fluid head.
 
Joined
Aug 11, 2017
Messages
2,756
Location
Florida
IMG_9098.jpeg
Both! But if I had to choose, pan head. I do 100x more glassing on a mule deer hunt than shooting.

There are also ways to shoot using tripod that don’t include locking in, and even if I have ball head, I’m still getting prone off pack if that’s an option.
 
Top