First lite brooks down

Joined
Dec 18, 2019
Messages
56
if you would like to multi layer under go for the XL, If not so much you should be good in the large would be a tight athletic fit.

Im a medium in the uncompahgre and a large in the catalyst
 
OP
F
Joined
Jan 14, 2020
Messages
880
I am thinking the chamberlain isn’t necessary for east coast after doing some reading. Like others have said it would be to noisy for the bow hunting we do here.
I am going to get a sanctuary for the cold and a catalyst for early season and layer under it if needed
 

bcar

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Mar 28, 2019
Messages
187
Location
Iowa
Camo is a different subject altogether, but for bowhunting whitetail I can't think of any down jacket that I would believe is quiet enough.

Agreed, you're going to hate the noise unless it's always windy where you bow hunt. If you layer with a soft shell or something else that's quiet over the down coat you'll be fine. That's what I do with an Eddie Bauer microtherm which is basically the same spec's as the Brooks.
 
OP
F
Joined
Jan 14, 2020
Messages
880
That’s what I was thinking the brooks for shed hunting and scouting. Even for bow hunting with the catalyst over it if cold. Then the sanctuary for the real cold days

if I ever plan a winter trip out west I’ll get a chamberlain
 

ChrisAU

WKR
Joined
Jan 12, 2018
Messages
6,731
Location
SE Alabama
Agreed, you're going to hate the noise unless it's always windy where you bow hunt. If you layer with a soft shell or something else that's quiet over the down coat you'll be fine. That's what I do with an Eddie Bauer microtherm which is basically the same spec's as the Brooks.

And it may not be enough to make a deer notice you move, but I have noticed overwhelmingly the few times this year that I’ve worn my uncompahgre vest under my Corrugate jacket rifle whitetail stand hunting that when I’m turning slowly trying to pinpoint a sound that I’m deafened by the sound of the vest. Even under a layer. This only applies to hunting in thick woods where sound is almost a more important sense than sight. I’ve noticed it to the point that I won’t wear it any more when stand hunting in the woods. Pretty sure the deer can’t hear it, but I can.
 
Joined
Nov 5, 2018
Messages
71
Location
Bellingham, WA
After trying the 3 in my pic I posted above I wound up with an Arc'Teryx Cerium LT Hoody btw. Couple ounces lighter than the SG. Was plenty warm at camp and glassing in well below freezing temps over light layers.


Not to hijack but I’m curious why you chose the cerium LT as it’s only slightly lighter than the SG but only has 3.4oz of 850fp down vs 5.3oz of 850fp down. Was the fit and finish better on the Arc’teryx jacket? I have a few other pieces from them so I know they make good stuff. I’m torn between these two.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

mxgsfmdpx

WKR
Joined
Oct 22, 2019
Messages
5,970
Location
Outside
That’s what I was thinking the brooks for shed hunting and scouting. Even for bow hunting with the catalyst over it if cold. Then the sanctuary for the real cold days

if I ever plan a winter trip out west I’ll get a chamberlain

If you do plan on running the brooks underneath the catalyst you will want to size up on the catalyst for sure. Its an athletic fit as it is and is really tight in the sleeves and will be super annoying with the brooks under it.
 

ChrisAU

WKR
Joined
Jan 12, 2018
Messages
6,731
Location
SE Alabama
Not to hijack but I’m curious why you chose the cerium LT as it’s only slightly lighter than the SG but only has 3.4oz of 850fp down vs 5.3oz of 850fp down. Was the fit and finish better on the Arc’teryx jacket? I have a few other pieces from them so I know they make good stuff. I’m torn between these two.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I didn’t feel as much of a warmth difference as you’d think given those #’s. One misleading stat for the Cerium LT is the fill power. They have 3.4oz of down plus some synthetic down in high moisture areas; the arm pits, the cuffs, and below the chin if I recall correctly. So there is more insulation than 3.4 oz. I also was able to get my Caribou color Cerium (great match for hunting garb) on closeout around $200 vs the $300 Grumman.
 
Joined
Nov 5, 2018
Messages
71
Location
Bellingham, WA
I didn’t feel as much of a warmth difference as you’d think given those #’s. One misleading stat for the Cerium LT is the fill power. They have 3.4oz of down plus some synthetic down in high moisture areas; the arm pits, the cuffs, and below the chin if I recall correctly. So there is more insulation than 3.4 oz. I also was able to get my Caribou color Cerium (great match for hunting garb) on closeout around $200 vs the $300 Grumman.
Thats good to know as I would have guessed there would be more of a warmth difference. I'm in the same boat with the Cerium LT as we have an Arcteryx outlet store locally and you can usually find decent deals.
 

Justin_the_EDG

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
May 28, 2017
Messages
111
Location
New Mexico
I believe First Lite calls the Brooks a midlayer piece. Maybe even considering it an "active" insulation layer if I remember correctly. That would explain the 20° suggested rating for what one would otherwise describe as a fairly lightweight standalone puffy.
 

Rommy

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Jan 31, 2018
Messages
200
Location
phoenix arizona
SG is “Stone Glacier”...which, by the way is my favorite all around puffy. If you truly want something for late season you need to go to the “next level” and look at the Chamberlain or Sitka Kelvin WS. The only downside to those is weight and bulk. But, if you want a warm jacket, you need weight and bulk.

As a CA boy who transplanted to Scottsdale arizona... if the SG with proper layering isn’t enough to keep me warm, then I’m probably going to stay indoors. Unless it’s a draw that I absolutely cannot say no too.

Sounds whimpy but to be in the back country for a long time when it’s THAT COLD sounds very dangerous to me. And I’m very experienced with backpacking.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
OP
F
Joined
Jan 14, 2020
Messages
880
Ok so looks like I will size up in the brooks and the catalyst

thanks
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 24, 2017
Messages
1,764
Location
Lenexa, KS
I think you’ll have a hard time layering the Brooks under the Catalyst - both are great pieces - I had both of them - the forearms in the catalyst were so tight I could only get a long sleeve tshirt under it. I’m 6’3” - 220 and the XL was perfect except for the forearms
 
Top