FFP Reticle image thread

Macintosh

WKR
Joined
Feb 17, 2018
Messages
1,976
The TLDR is that I'm selfishly trying to find a better way to compare scopes without having to look at them in person--so I'm hoping to crowd-source this by having people post a picture of their reticle at lowest and highest magnification.

I've had a really difficult time getting a look at various reticles as I'm scope shopping, and the images on manufacturers and retailers websites virtually never include an image at low power. I'm finicky about the reticle and lowest-magnification useability is one of the most-important factors in a scope for me after the basics like "does it hold zero". Since there are NO retailers of higher-quality scopes near me, it's been a frustrating experience scope-shopping online. If I cant get a look through all the scopes I want, I'm wondering if people can post them to get a better sense, so in one place anyone could compare two different reticles. Not the same as being there, but better than the one marketing image at full magnification.

So,
1) post 2 pictures of your reticle showing the full field of view against the sky or a white background, with the illumination OFF.
one at lowest-magnification,
one at highest magnification,
2) tell us the
scope brand and model (Nightforce ATACR 4-16x42)
Focal plane
Manufacturers official reticle name


If you are feeling generous, you could include a link or image to the manufacturers subtension diagram for that reticle, or perhaps an additional image against a cluttered background to show how awesome your reticle is, or a low-light image, or one with illumination on...but the white or sky background should allow better comparison between reticles in different pictures.

Once a good in-focus set of images of a reticle is posted, there's no need to continue posting it if it doesn't add anything (if you have the same reticle and it looks different in a different magnification scope, by all means please post!!). The exception might be some of the nightforce reticles like the mil-R that apparently has several versions of the same reticle depending on what model and magnification of scope it's on...

Thanks in advance, and hopefully this also helps others who'd like to see and compare various reticles.
 
Last edited:
OP
M

Macintosh

WKR
Joined
Feb 17, 2018
Messages
1,976
@TK-421 you're my man! I was hoping someone would have mil-c as well as some of the mil-r variations. I have some more too I'll take photos of at home later.

And yes, the photos never do it justice, hopefully they are all "equally bad" so some degree of comparison is possible. Hopefully! Since many diagrams don't include a low-magnification image I'm hoping this will be helpful for some to get a better feel. As an example, my reticle above is .06mil and I would say it's on the very thin end of acceptable for me at 3x, so there has to be some subjectivity to this, and I'm hoping to make it a bit easier for myself and others to see and decide for themselves.
 
Last edited:
OP
M

Macintosh

WKR
Joined
Feb 17, 2018
Messages
1,976
From @sndmn11 drop test link above: (not my photos, just reposted from his test)

NF SHV 4.5-14 F1
Mil-R. Nightforce indicates that the mil-R reticle has different variations, somif anyone has it in the smaller atacr’s and other scopes please post yours.
14x
4A197B24-0A1E-436E-9B3E-B8202C5D3D85.jpegE6F4A587-1C01-4598-B007-968993FE2D0B.png

4.5x
F15E7CEC-F274-4D5E-A2D3-CE79212D2CBF.jpeg
 
OP
M

Macintosh

WKR
Joined
Feb 17, 2018
Messages
1,976
Hadnt seen that. Guess my wonderful idea isnt so original!
Still very few images in the lower magnification range though.
 
Last edited:
OP
M

Macintosh

WKR
Joined
Feb 17, 2018
Messages
1,976
…If NF filled-in the left & right "arrowheads", and provided a bottom post starting about 8-10 mils down from center, this (mil-c) would be a far more useable general purpose reticle. Also get rid of the inverted T.
Agree 100%, although I dont know why I need more than 5 mils of elevation hold, whats the rationale for 8-10 mils? Am I just not taking enough 900+ yard shots using nothing but my reticle, or are folks using it just for a tape measure?
Its interesting to me that especially on low power some of the “finer lines” that have .1 or .2 mil hashes actually appear darker and catch your eye more than the slightly thicker lines that have more widely-spaced hashes…my eye is actually drawn to that inverted T more than the center of the main crosshair.
 
Last edited:

JCMCUBIC

WKR
Joined
Nov 22, 2020
Messages
344
Agree with the above on open reticles will massive windage. I hunted in mixed terrain from wooded mt sides to ag fields in the valley's. Even in the ag fields, most shots are against a broken background where game steps out. Super fine reticles can get lost in the broken backgrounds, especially in low light.

Sorry, these aren't on a clear background but I had these previously posted somewhere else. There a drop of water on the lower right quad of the lens so ignore it. Tangent Theta's Long Range Hunter Mrad reticle with 3.5 mil per side is the best hunting reticle for all distances, power ranges, cover, and light conditions I've found. Really good all around FFP hunting reticle.

3x
153742.jpg


6x
153743.jpg


10x
153744.jpg


15x
153745.jpg
 
OP
M

Macintosh

WKR
Joined
Feb 17, 2018
Messages
1,976
@SouthPaw thanks, Ive spoken to a few people that like that reticle. Is the circle illuminated on that, more than the circle, etc?
 

SouthPaw

WKR
Joined
Apr 10, 2014
Messages
747
Location
Northern CA
@SouthPaw thanks, Ive spoken to a few people that like that reticle. Is the circle illuminated on that, more than the circle, etc?
This is the original LRHS, no illumination so I couldn't tell you. They made later versions called the LRHSi / LRTSi that have it.

Some like the reticle donut, some hate it. I find it quite helpful at low power and don't notice it at mid-high power. Just wish it had a bit better FOV, but thus far its one of my favorite FFPs along with the MQ.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 5, 2019
Messages
991
This is the original LRHS, no illumination so I couldn't tell you. They made later versions called the LRHSi / LRTSi that have it, plus the GAP LRHS2 has illumination.

Some like the reticle donut, some hate it. I find it quite helpful at low power and don't notice it at mid-high power. Just wish it had a bit better FOV, but thus far its one of my favorite FFPs along with the MQ.
The LRHS2 from GAP is Non-Illuminated
 

prm

WKR
Joined
Mar 31, 2017
Messages
2,177
Location
No. VA
Agree with the above on open reticles will massive windage. I hunted in mixed terrain from wooded mt sides to ag fields in the valley's. Even in the ag fields, most shots are against a broken background where game steps out. Super fine reticles can get lost in the broken backgrounds, especially in low light.

Sorry, these aren't on a clear background but I had these previously posted somewhere else. There a drop of water on the lower right quad of the lens so ignore it. Tangent Theta's Long Range Hunter Mrad reticle with 3.5 mil per side is the best hunting reticle for all distances, power ranges, cover, and light conditions I've found. Really good all around FFP hunting reticle.

3x
153742.jpg


6x
153743.jpg


10x
153744.jpg


15x
153745.jpg
Hard to not like that. They could make the main bars thicker just outside the 6x FOV to help with 3x shooting in the timber, but thats a minor point. Not bad as is.
 
OP
M

Macintosh

WKR
Joined
Feb 17, 2018
Messages
1,976
Vortex viper pst gen II 5-25
Ffp
EBR-2C mrad
Its actually one of the better prs-style reticles Ive used for crossover to hunting. I do like the illumination being only on the center + rather than including the tree.
5x, 15x, 25x and 5x with illumination. (Apologies for crappy pics)
9EA7CA62-43A5-44C9-A77A-00E064A10B7C.jpeg
F8B62D93-2D9A-4C97-B6B7-6733D434A182.jpeg
CA68F708-8FCE-470F-ABCF-6E0297352C72.jpeg
184DB99B-3984-40AC-9ACA-30C639E411B2.jpeg


Stolen from the drop test thread at
Trijicon tenmile 3-18
Ffp
Mrad precision tree reticle
3x, 9x, 18x and 3x illuminated

475746AC-F4B4-4EC9-A0AB-5992A37D2386.jpegB54246DE-ABE0-435D-B05F-F6F3C663C51B.jpegFAEB2521-697A-4424-830D-207292ACE594.jpegD0CF2A45-E572-4AD2-BF4A-297CA2EC45F4.jpeg
 
Last edited:
OP
M

Macintosh

WKR
Joined
Feb 17, 2018
Messages
1,976
Still hoping some folks can post some pics of some of the other Nightforce reticles, Mil-R in all its variations (4-16 atacr), Mil-xt, etc. With all the NF scopes around here someone must have?
 
OP
M

Macintosh

WKR
Joined
Feb 17, 2018
Messages
1,976
Updating with a few more. (Also see much better comparison photos a couple posts below—this post the two ohotos had very different ligjt conditions so its fairly misleading comparing the two
Scopes)

For comparison…a regular old duplex reticle on a leupold VX3 2.5-8. (2fp)
F749ABC8-77FA-42D5-A867-E8ECD4678D29.jpeg

And my S&B 3-12 ffp 3-12k P3L at 3x. Same day, same view, you can see the reticle but it was snowing now so the light was very different. This isnt a good comparison of the 2 scopes so I added a bunch of better comparison images below.
EC755242-3528-4289-A03A-77549771D9E1.jpeg
 
Last edited:
OP
M

Macintosh

WKR
Joined
Feb 17, 2018
Messages
1,976
Athlon Cronus BTR 4.5-29 gen 1
Ffp
APRS1 reticle
29x, 4.5x
any CA or blurriness is my photo.

0F1F1221-97C2-4E5F-A151-FF25372C6DC0.jpeg3E893500-1CD3-4DD1-9F74-9988D5A8229A.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Top