Digiscoping with Binocs

Joined
Mar 31, 2013
Messages
384
Location
Beatrice, Ne
I am wanting to get some new glass. I have been kicking around getting a pair of 15#56's Vortex Kaibab bionoc's. I think they will work for what I want out of my glass for spotting muleys or elk. I think I wont be glassing much over a mile at the most. I also dont need to check over the animal in great detail as far as trophy potential.

I would mount them on a tripod just like a spotter. My question is Tines up offers an adapter with camera for these binoc's. Would I get decent pictures using the binoc's or should I go with a Razor spotter instead?
 
Mule thanks for sharing that. Im going to snag one of these for sure.
 
This is my second year using one. Not as slim as a dedicated case but you will not need to buy another adapter when you change phones. There is also an adapter plate so you can use a point and shoot or gopro with it.
 
Thanks muleman.

However I am curious about the difference in pictures using binoc's compared to a spotter.

With the same quality optic glass, the biggest differences is you will not have as much magnification with the binos. Less magnification has a benefit in increased transmitted light. Higher magnification = less light = slower shutter speeds = blurred pictures.


Here is a hand held, cell phone picture taken through tripod mounted 10x binoculars in a dimly lit room. Not sure if you will be able to zoom in to see the fine line detail in the decoy's head. I don't have sided by side photos through a spotting scope readily available, but the past comparison scope pictures at 20x were noticeably darker with all other camera parameters being the same.

ZHT10x42Decoy.jpg
 
Thank you Muleman. You definitely answered my question. I am going to buy a new set of binocs and an adapter to give it a try.
 
Here is a better field example. Once again, a hand held cell phone picture through window mounted 10x42 binoculars. This was taken just before dark at 8:46pm on an rainy evening. Aperture was 2.2, shutter speed a slow 1/15sec, and ISO was a high 1000. I was trying to resolve the detail in the weeds 40yds away.

ZHT10x42_FieldDusk.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top