Deer cartridges with minimal recoil

[Skydog]

The 90 grain BT will be just fine if you want to go that way.

The 95 grain Winchester is a NBT, just coated black.

To be completely honest, if you are limiting your range to around 300 yards, the "cheap" factory Federal, Winchester, or Remington ammo with 100 grain Soft Points will be just fine without the "premium" price tag.

In regard to the Accubonds...wouldn't they be even better than the Ballistic Tips? Wouldn't they have all the same expansion/wound characteristics of the BTs, but with less fragmentation, more weight retention, no lead/copper separation, better penetration, etc.? It seems like the bonding would provide some additional insurance for these smaller bullets, especially when a less than perfect broadside shot is not available.

 

[Bugger]

Wouldn't they have all the same expansion/wound characteristics of the BTs, but with less fragmentation

Can’t have the same wound characteristics without the same fragmentation. There’s not a single shot angle I’d take with the accubond that I wouldn’t with a 95BT. It’s a more stout jacket than you’d think.

 

[wind gypsy]

In regard to the Accubonds...wouldn't they be even better than the Ballistic Tips? Wouldn't they have all the same expansion/wound characteristics of the BTs, but with less fragmentation, more weight retention, no lead/copper separation, better penetration, etc.? It seems like the bonding would provide some additional insurance for these smaller bullets, especially when a less than perfect broadside shot is not available.

Less fragmentation means the expansion and wound characteristics are not the same. The BT is a stoutly constructed bullet so if you believe it will penetrate sufficiently (I do), faster expansion and less weight retention generally correspond with larger diameter wounds for a given bullet dia/weight and thus offer more "insurance". To me, the primary reason to choose an accubond over a BT would be to minimize meat damage.

Nosler's own words:
Externally, they look the same except for the tip colors, Ballistic Tip® bullets are color-coded by caliber while all AccuBond® bullets have white tips. Internally the Ballistic Tip® is not bonded and is designed for controlled expansion on medium game with approximately 50-60% weight retention. Conversely, the lead alloy core of the AccuBond® is bonded to the jacket. This bonding increases weight retention (65-70%) and slows expansion resulting in deeper penetration and enhanced bone-breaking potential in larger animals.

 

[Ringbill27]

In opinion, for whatever that is worth, the 243win, 6.5 creed and the 7mm08 are all deer killers. All are more than capable of killing deer to 300yds. I don’t believe that the recoil difference between the three is enough to really be noticeable.

Seems these days the creed is the easy button for heavy bullets, ammo selection, and availability. Followed by the 243(minus the heavy bullets) then the 7mm08. With that being said I’d probably choose the 6.5creed, But!

I love the 7mm08 always have. So I’d pick up a Tikka T3x lite SS chop it, thread it and suppress/brake it. Bam my forever deer rifle.

Suppress/braking any these cartridges will result it very little recoil.

 

[liv3mind]

In opinion, for whatever that is worth, the 243win, 6.5 creed and the 7mm08 are all deer killers. All are more than capable of killing deer to 300yds. I don’t believe that the recoil difference between the three is enough to really be noticeable.

Seems these days the creed is the easy button for heavy bullets, ammo selection, and availability. Followed by the 243(minus the heavy bullets) then the 7mm08. With that being said I’d probably choose the 6.5creed, But!

I love the 7mm08 always have. So I’d pick up a Tikka T3x lite SS chop it, thread it and suppress/brake it. Bam my forever deer rifle.

Suppress/braking any these cartridges will result it very little recoil.

708 is super underrated and is a fantastic choice. Even better if you reload

 

[Pokerface]

243 if you want to be part of the non gun looney crowd. 6.5 Grendel if you want to start getting into the looney crowd. I have not yet reached looney status, but I own and have shot both. Both are very good deer killers... Joe

 

[Skydog]

I'm actually amazed at what all is available that I was totally unaware of. For the last 25+ years I've been perfectly content with my old 1988 model, wood stocked A-bolt in .270 Win. It just worked, so there was no reason to change. Now I'm being forced to change due to health issues. So, I've been somewhat oblivious to all the changes that have taken place and the current trends in rifle designs, new cartridge/bullet development, use of ARs and suppressors, mini-actions, small caliber/light bullets, extreme long-range shooting, etc. It's all very interesting. And I'm sure it's all very effective. But...I'll probably remain "old school" and stick with a classic cartridge like the .243. Not sure if I'll ever reach "looney status".

 

[ElPollo]

250 savage is my favorite deer round, 110 gr eldx @2850 is deadly in my custom Ruger No.1.

That’s the original, old school small bore big game cartridge.

 

[Deere_Man]

I’ve picked up some of the 90gr Nosler Ballistic Tips for my 243 Win that are supposed to be perfectly matched with a 1:10” twist, where as the 95gr is more iffy unless you are at 1:9 or 1:8”.

 

[HandgunHTR]

I’ve picked up some of the 90gr Nosler Ballistic Tips for my 243 Win that are supposed to be perfectly matched with a 1:10” twist, where as the 95gr is more iffy unless you are at 1:9 or 1:8”.

The 95 grain Winchester Silvertips are just fine in a 1:10". As are the 100 grain Core-loct from Remington, and the 100 grain Federal SPs.

@Skydog , in regards to your question about the Accubond over the BT, the guys have already pretty much answered the question, but I will chime in to say I agree with them wholeheartedly. If you want "insurance" then choose the BT over the AB. In regards to "shot angle", there is no ethical shot angle where the AB will outperform the BT, and I would go so far as to say there is not shot angle at all. I only put "ethical" in there because some folks seem to think it is OK to take a TX heart shot or a back of the head shot as long as the animal is a "lifetime" animal.

 

[Skydog]

The 95 grain Winchester Silvertips are just fine in a 1:10". As are the 100 grain Core-loct from Remington, and the 100 grain Federal SPs.

@Skydog , in regards to your question about the Accubond over the BT, the guys have already pretty much answered the question, but I will chime in to say I agree with them wholeheartedly. If you want "insurance" then choose the BT over the AB. In regards to "shot angle", there is no ethical shot angle where the AB will outperform the BT, and I would go so far as to say there is not shot angle at all. I only put "ethical" in there because some folks seem to think it is OK to take a TX heart shot or a back of the head shot as long as the animal is a "lifetime" animal.

I fully agree with your comments about ethical shot angles. I prefer broadside shots through the lungs and preserving as much meat as possible. The only angle I was thinking about is when you don't have that perfect broadside shot and the angle of the shot hits the far side shoulder/bone. I was wondering if the AB would be a better bullet in that situation.

 

[Ringbill27]

708 is super underrated and is a fantastic choice. Even better if you reload

Yep that 120gr ttsx with stout load of big game is almost magic.