Crispi Thor Equivalent

isu22andy

WKR
Joined
Sep 13, 2018
Messages
417
Location
IA
Tried on some Crispi Thor GTX and like the design weight of the boot but the insole felt a little stiff /hard to me compared to my Crispi west rivers - Will this be something that breaks in and works or should I go with a boot with a more comfortable insole ? What other company or Crispi model has something similar to these ? Light weight uninsulated and waterproof .
 
Why don’t you just put a different insole in the boot?

I’ve got a pair of Thor boots and use the stock insole from a pair of Schnees Beartooth II boots. My foot really likes that combo, I’ve never cared for the stock crispi insoles.

If you wanted a whole different boot then, to my eye, the Hanwag Makra Combi GTX looks similar.
 
You guys that have the Thor's, how does the ankle support feel when carrying a heavy pack? Looking for a warmer weather compliment to my Briksdal SF's.
 
I have Crispis with the ABSS and Thors which don’t have the ABSS. No comparison, imo. The lack of ankle support is very noticeable. I love my Thor’s for light hiking, but if you want ankle support, I wouldn’t recommend the Thor’s.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
I found the third to be good for hiking but not so much for hunting. It’s a nice light stiff boot that for me works well with lighter loads (like for day long peak bagging trips) but for hauling game out I’ll take my birksdall a any day.
 
Tried on some Crispi Thor GTX and like the design weight of the boot but the insole felt a little stiff /hard to me compared to my Crispi west rivers - Will this be something that breaks in and works or should I go with a boot with a more comfortable insole ? What other company or Crispi model has something similar to these ? Light weight uninsulated and waterproof .

My Crispi Thors are almost as far from stiff as it gets, seriously. I am not sure what you're going to find that is much more flexible while still being capable in the mountains. In any case I have the Thors and the Briksdal SFs and neither required any break in whatsoever for me. Other boots I have worn have required 10-20 miles.
 
I wore the bottom off a set of Thor’s in no time.,,, Crispi told me that’s the trade off for a lightweight boot. Not a big Crispi fan after that email
 
My Crispi Thors are almost as far from stiff as it gets, seriously. I am not sure what you're going to find that is much more flexible while still being capable in the mountains. In any case I have the Thors and the Briksdal SFs and neither required any break in whatsoever for me. Other boots I have worn have required 10-20 miles.
Do you mean the upper is not stiff ? The sole is definitely not as flexible as a lot of other boots and rated on the stiffer side by Crispi.

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
 
Do you mean the upper is not stiff ? The sole is definitely not as flexible as a lot of other boots and rated on the stiffer side by Crispi.

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

No. I mean the boot, the sole. The upper stiffness is near irrelevant. I have Briksdal SFs and my Thor GTXs are not even comparable in stiffness. Crispi has been known to recycle names so I am not sure if there was an "update" but mine are very flexible(if they did update they look the same as every pic I have seen). I would not choose to wear them in terrain outside of easy foothills or typical antelope terrain. I wore them on my NZ hunt and they were not horrible but it is not a boot I would recommend for that terrain. I am actually wearing them in my profile pic on my coues deer hunt. They were very comfortable but did not have the support I would want. The Briksdal SF on the other hand is a very stiff boot but still comfortable in easier terrain. They are both awesome boots with different purposes in my opinion. I bought mine in 2018 if that helps. I would recommend the OP call Crispi and tell them what you want. They have excellent customer service in my experience.
 
Back
Top