Still scratching my head. If it’s accurate, all I can think is that if the deer were way below objective, they had more resources available. But I really don’t know either.I read that too and wasn’t sure if it was a misprint. I just don’t see there being an ounce of truth in that statement but maybe something bizarre happened and since desperate deer are somewhat willing to winter in peoples yards etc they fared better?
Could also be mortality was high but with the CWD prevalence up there they were OK with herd reduction? Just throwing out random guesses, but nobody ever said “Man I hope these elk make it thru, of coarse the deer will be fine”.