CPW meeting in Durango recap

Poser

WKR
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
6,610
Location
Durango CO
About 100+ people in attendance including 2 flatbills, however the majority of the crowd was rancher types: lots of wool vests and cowboy boots. Saw one outfitter (or at least a guy wearing an outfitter jacket). Median age was likely 63.

The district manager, who sports a 1911 and the regional biologist, who was a little too soft spoken to manage such a outspoken crowd did all of the talking, but there were 7 or 8 wardens in attendance. It seems that the primary purpose of the change to limited draw is not to manage the number of hunters but to significantly reduce the number of cows killed by issuing sex specific tags. It was emphasized that there was no desire to create trophy units or to even require 2 or 3 points to draw. Sounds like there will be enough tags for everyone to draw 1st choice

-there will be no mandatory harvest reporting anytime soon and if you want that, you’ll have to take it to the commission.

Beyond that, the Q and A quickly devolved into complaints about Non residents, wolves, Mtn bikes, dirt bikes, wolves again, non residents some more, the delusional suggestion of bringing back spring near season, wolves yet again, “why can’t we do it like New Mexico and Arizona?”, revisited data reporting complaints, more complaints about non residents, more questions about why the biologists can’t reinstate spring Bear season with the stroke of pen , and some more about wolves. There were multiple know-it-all’s present. Some of them made rambling comments without questions. Complaints about locals saving for high point units not being able to draw local tags meanwhile the non residents get “all of the tags.” It was suggested that NR elk tags are too cheap and raising the price would run some folks off to other states and that would be good. There was also a bit more cussing than one might expect.

All in all, people seem to want a singular definitive explanation for elk decline and can’t seem to wrap their heads around complex issues. Furthermore, most seem entirely incapable of perceiving complex issues from a perspective other than their own (“I’ve been hunting the same spot for 20 years with a bow I made myself and someone from PA killed all the elk with a fancy bow.”)

Also, people like to badger a soft spoken, somewhat hard of hearing biologist about legislation issues of which he has no control and then The guy with the 1911 and the Wyatt Earp mustache has to reinstate order. Did I mention wolves which the CPW can’t comment on? Also, wolves, wolves and more wolves, spring bear season and mandatory reporting. People don’t seem to understand legislative processes or that game wardens, biologists or even district managers don’t make rules and can’t make changes at the suggestion of old dudes in wool vest, know it alls.

The lack of perceptiveness in the crowd was an overwhelmingly depressing view on the state of intellectualism and philosophical thought as it relates to the hunting community. Also, people are too emotional and complain too much.

Favorite comment of the night:

“I’m trying to fill my freezer. If you got ten thousand dollars to spend on a elk hunt in Colorado, then you can afford to go to the grocery store”

2415934f023c9656de0f0b112fd13b27.jpg
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the recap.

That’s the state of America today. Emotions and feelings run the show. Had a mother at my sons practice today whining to coaches about making two teams so all the kids could play more. Keep in mind these are damn 1st graders and she is butt hurt about what she felt was “jv and varsity split” teams. So now every kid will get less experience including her own son.
 
The meeting was kind of a joke. I do wonder why CPW is so against harvest reporting though. It's not difficult and would probably save them money from paying people to call hunters on the phone. Having some real data could also help with herd management.
 
My takeaways were the guys talking about Arizona and new Mexico had valid points they were just bad at expressing them. Colorado is too liberal with their tags and prices. We are the last true OTC state and it is not viable. We are also on the cheap side compared to the other states. It's definitely time to look at going all limited and I've suggested for a while a hard 80/20 split and adjust prices on bother sides accordingly. Habitat and winter range came up quite a bit, but it never really got answered. CPW totally ignored the guy that asked about habitat stamps and where that money is going. I was surprised they brought up bears and lions. They also said there is a meeting next week and that they are revamping the lion season structure and quota. They also said they hadn't adjusted the lion quotas since 2004. They did admit we have a bear issue but didn't totally address it. Some of the questions were ridiculous and had no relevance, but that is usually the case at some of these meetings. I was pretty pleased with the turnout.
 
My takeaways were the guys talking about Arizona and new Mexico had valid points they were just bad at expressing them. Colorado is too liberal with their tags and prices. We are the last true OTC state and it is not viable. We are also on the cheap side compared to the other states. It's definitely time to look at going all limited and I've suggested for a while a hard 80/20 split and adjust prices on bother sides accordingly. Habitat and winter range came up quite a bit, but it never really got answered. CPW totally ignored the guy that asked about habitat stamps and where that money is going. I was surprised they brought up bears and lions. They also said there is a meeting next week and that they are revamping the lion season structure and quota. They also said they hadn't adjusted the lion quotas since 2004. They did admit we have a bear issue but didn't totally address it. Some of the questions were ridiculous and had no relevance, but that is usually the case at some of these meetings. I was pretty pleased with the turnout.
+1
d.png
 
I had every intention of going last night, then had a more pressing work issue that needed addressed. Kind of glad that I didn’t waste my time now, thanks for the update. The game warden I talked with basically told me all of the information I needed last week. His explanation was reasonable and just in my opinion. Side note, the older 63 year old is an outfitter. He works on the 75/751 divide.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Thanks for the update, non resident here so I’m kinda bummed about it, differently some cursing when I read about it happening. We had a blast in our unit last year and was looking forward to coming back. But being a draw would make for a whole lot better hunting and we had some real good hunting at that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Well, the general consensus seems to be that you have to voice your opinion and be heard to get any change. Sounds like they accomplished that.

You know........IF reducing the number of cows being killed by archery hunters is the goal........then going to OTC bull only archery tags across the entire state would make more sense. Then in those units that they want to issue archery cow tags, they still can.
 
Last edited:
Its obvious that many dont realize that these meetings are 'Informational Only'.
The decision makers are not in the room.

In fact, the decisions were made months ago.
These guys are just the 'CPW information vehicle & face' to the public.

But the CPW can now say they had the public meetings to avoid any backlash.
 
Well, the general consensus seems to be that you have to voice your opinion and be heard to get any change. Sounds like they accomplished that.

You know........IF reducing the number of cows being killed by archery hunters is the goal........then going to OTC bull only archery tags across the entire state would make more sense. Then in those units that they want to issue archery cow tags, they still can.

They did say that was considered, but they wanted to continue to offer some cow tags so long as it is feasible because there is a contingency of people who want To hunt cows.
 
They did say that was considered, but they wanted to continue to offer some cow tags so long as it is feasible because there is a contingency of people who want To hunt cows.

I remember back in the early 90s, it was a real treat to get a cow tag.
Then there was the elk population boom of the 2000s and they started issuing cow tags like Halloween candy.
 
Back
Top