- Thread Starter
- #21
better safe than sorry. I just about broke the action screws in my T/C one time as I forgot to use anti-seize- never again! BH209 is the stuff like you say.
With most rifles having a maximum of 120grs volume of BH, is that rifle actually rated by Cooper to 150grs VOLUME of BH209?
Should have said, verify with a clean bore and see what it does.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Good question. Cooper rates it to 200grains. This is what Cooper’s manual said
I went to Blackhorn’s site and it was not clear what a gun rated for 200grs black powder or substitute could take for BH.
What do you think? Did I push the envelope going to 150gr BH?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If Cooper didn't send a rifle to be tested by Western, I'm not sure I'd exceed Western's 120gr volume maximum. Then again, the manual states 200grs of BP or "common" substitutes, so it should be a strong system. I don't believe that means BH as one of the "common" substitutes. That's what has me asking the question, as I have no clue how strong the action breech plug and barrel is.
I do know that Western has specifically tested the Remington Ultimate Muzzleloader (RUM) and states 160grs is a maximum of BH209. The rifle is capable of 200grs of BP or any other of the "common" substitutes. The Ultimate BP Xpress I shoot is rated identical.
I have no clue....... which is why I'm asking. So far I believe you've been shooting lighter bullets. Without knowing the system, I'd be cautious shooting heavy bullets with large charges of BH. As I say, I have no clue.
OK, I got a response from Cooper on the max charge of BH209:
"We follow the guidelines of Western Powders regarding BH209 powder which is a max of 120 grains by volume."
So, sounds like no one wants to go there and endorse anything above 120..., so I'll do the same. I should have asked specifically before I went above 120 but I didn't. Gotta live dangerously once in a while.
I think with the way that it's shooting with charges 120gr and below that there's really no need to go higher. Unless he wants to be like Austin Powers "I too, like to live dangerously".I had to ask, as there are only two rifles that I know of that are rated either by the rifle manufacturer, or Western, for charges above the 120gr volume maximum that Western has published.
Now I do have other thoughts, but they should probably remain undiscussed in an open forum. I'm glad that you received the information, even though it may not have been what you wanted. Safety first....
Hey! Thanks for the leads on the other brands of bullets. Much appreciated and I'll give them a try. Just need to draw a muzz tag. I'll know on Idaho in a few weeks. Maybe I'll get to try some.Great review Robby. Ive had a cooper ML of a few years now and have really enjoyed it. Might give a few more bullets a try in your gun. I've had great success with the Harvester Sabertooth for a bullet legal in states that make you shoot next to bore. The Parker ballistic extreme and Match hunter (best but stupid expensive) both shot the best in my gun and a few other smoke poles I've fiddled with. I also really like the Harvester Scorpion for the money. My groups really tightened up when I started weight my charges rather than using the volume method. 84 weight grs is eq. to 120 Volume. I push the 275 ballistic extreme with 80 weighted grs and seems to be a really good hunting load. Talking to cooper and some other manufactures I also felt like living dangerously and went up to 100 weighted grs (~142 volume) of BH. I saw some speed increase but even with quality heavy bullets 300+ my groups got drastically worse. The additional recoil and loss of accuracy wasn't worth the marginal speed increase in my book.