Concerned about CWD In Idaho

Terrapin

WKR
Joined
Jan 14, 2014
Messages
365
I’m confused about what’s going on with CWD in Idaho. I heard that there have been a couple of outbreaks at elk ranches… and due to slow reporting those animals have been shipped to shoot ranches all over the state. This is concerning in and of itself, but the state is also considering loosening the safety requirements for elk ranches/ high fence shoot farms… supposedly to make it easier and more profitable for the elk farmers.

I’m definitely pro property & business rights, but these twenty elk ranches and shoot farms in Idaho are jeopardizing our entire elk and deer population. They must have an incredible lobby if they can justify this amount of risk to profit such a small number of ranchers.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Joined
Sep 13, 2016
Messages
2,515
Location
Idaho
I’m confused about what’s going on with CWD in Idaho. I heard that there have been a couple of outbreaks at elk ranches… and due to slow reporting those animals have been shipped to shoot ranches all over the state. This is concerning in and of itself, but the state is also considering loosening the safety requirements for elk ranches/ high fence shoot farms… supposedly to make it easier and more profitable for the elk farmers.

I’m definitely pro property & business rights, but these twenty elk ranches and shoot farms in Idaho are jeopardizing our entire elk and deer population. They must have an incredible lobby if they can justify this amount of risk to profit such a small number of ranchers.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

And yes, they have a helluva lobbyist.
 

GRIZFUR

FNG
Joined
Feb 7, 2018
Messages
6
Location
ID
Idaho has had its first 2 cases of CWD in domestic elk, both in December of 2024. Two separate facilities, the first case was found in Madison County the second case in Jefferson County. At this point CWD has not been found in wild deer, elk or moose in the region.

Domestic Elk ranches are under the oversight of the Idaho State Department of Agriculture, ISDA.

There are rule changes, currently being considered by our state legislature, that would loosen restrictions and requirements on ranches that are CWD positive.

02.04.19 – RULES GOVERNING DOMESTIC CERVIDAE

DOCKET NO. 02-0419-2401

NOTICE OF RULEMAKING – PROPOSED RULE

These changes are supported by ISDA, the agricultural affairs subcommittee and the ISDA Veterinarian, Scott Leibsle.

The first rule change would no longer require a CWD positive facility to build a second perimeter fence. Previously a ranch with a CWD positive result was required to build a second perimeter fence with a 10-foot offset, to create a buffer between wild and domestic herds. Hopefully containing CWD to the facility. This change was implemented to benefit shooting ranches. They have large, fenced areas and did not want to be forced to build a second perimeter fence.

The second rule change will allow for the transport of CWD infected, exposed and suspect animals to another facility owned by the same ranch. Prior regulation would not allow for any transport of these animals. This change was implemented to benefit the shooting ranches also.

Under current ISDA regulation, domestic cervid ranches in Idaho are required to submit tissue samples for CWD testing on an annual basis. This means that the ranch can hold a tissue sample and submit it for testing December. The CWD positive elk from Jefferson County died in June and tissue samples were not sent in until the end of the year. 6 months passed between the animals death and the positive result for CWD. To be compliant with USDA, which is not required by ISDA, tissue samples must be submitted to a certified lab within 7 days for testing, I believe that Idaho should follow these USDA guidelines.

These rule changes and testing regulations are a threat to Idaho’s wild deer, elk and moose herds.

If there is a domestic elk ranch near where you live or hunt you should be very concerned.

Both ranches imported animal from Canada that were CWD positive according to Scott Leibsle, the ISDA state veterinarian. If it happened at these ranches it could happen at any elk ranch in the state. To be clear the CWD positive cow, that died in June in Jefferson County, was not imported. That cow was born on that farm and had never left the facility until her death. That cow contracted CWD from another elk within the facility.

These rule changes are being put in place to protect the Elk ranchers of the state, fewer than 20. These shooting ranches sell millions of dollars of “hunts” a year. They can afford fencing. The elk from the facility in Jefferson County are owned by the Broadmouth Canyon Ranch.



Please contact your Senators and Representatives to express your opposition to these rule changes.
 

GRIZFUR

FNG
Joined
Feb 7, 2018
Messages
6
Location
ID
Joined
Aug 21, 2016
Messages
945
Location
Midwest
CWD is nothing but a cash grab for those who stake their ENTIRE careers “researching” it using federal grants.

You can safely move on from worrying about any negative effects on the Elk or Deer populations. Some places it’s been endemic for 50 years with no ill effects 👍
 

TaperPin

WKR
Joined
Jul 12, 2023
Messages
3,968
CWD is nothing but a cash grab for those who stake their ENTIRE careers “researching” it using federal grants.

You can safely move on from worrying about any negative effects on the Elk or Deer populations. Some places it’s been endemic for 50 years with no ill effects 👍
So the deer missing out our back door are just hiding? It sounds cool to blame it on govt waste, like animals with it go on to lead normal happy lives, but you obviously don’t keep up with what is actually happening. Or do you think the tracking collars are what has been killing deer?
 

IdahoBeav

WKR
Joined
Jan 29, 2017
Messages
1,021
What can even be done except to educate on how it spreads and what hunters can do to help reduce the spread?
 

TaperPin

WKR
Joined
Jul 12, 2023
Messages
3,968
What concerns me as much as CWD is how actual field science now has to be displayed at the Junior High level for people to stop long enough to actually comprehend what is being said, and yet there are plenty of “experts” to dispute if these deer actually died. *chuckle*

(hugs to everyone offended by this post)

IMG_0308.jpeg
 
Joined
May 17, 2015
Messages
918
What concerns me as much as CWD is how actual field science now has to be displayed at the Junior High level for people to stop long enough to actually comprehend what is being said, and yet there are plenty of “experts” to dispute if these deer actually died. *chuckle*

View attachment 835117

It doesn’t say they died from CWD if you put a tracking collar on 10 bucks in unit 39 in Idaho I guarantee you’d have less bucks 10 months into the study than they did and that is not a CWD area


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

TaperPin

WKR
Joined
Jul 12, 2023
Messages
3,968
Like magic my censored replies are back.

Oh, I must have to apologize for not knowing someone in here is so sensitive. Do you need a hug, whoever you are? It’s rough enough in this world without people that aren’t gentle with their worlds and it hurts your heart. Was it my poking fun at Junior High level graphs? Are you sensitive about graphs, or is it offensive to Junior High kids? I asked one of the toddlers if the graph was going up or down and he even knew, so maybe it’s sub Junior High. IDK Extra hugs and I’ll buy everyone ice cream.

It doesn’t say they died from CWD if you put a tracking collar on 10 bucks in unit 39 in Idaho I guarantee you’d have less bucks 10 months into the study than they did and that is not a CWD area


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The herd has a 85% survival from year to year prior to CWD, the collared deer after CWD showed had a 50% mortality. There were no animals taken by hunting and it’s primarily agricultural land where winter kill isn’t an issue. If you had read the article you’d know that. Hold on - we’re watching Ms Rachel - she may have a graph that will help shows the difference between 85% and 50%.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0309.jpeg
    IMG_0309.jpeg
    198 KB · Views: 1

IdahoBeav

WKR
Joined
Jan 29, 2017
Messages
1,021
Ah yes, trying to poke fun at someone's young age while not realizing that there are two separate ongoing threads on this topic
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
1,087
Location
Colorado
CO and WY have had CWD for 40 years. The sky isn't falling.
It was first discovered nearly 60 years ago, in CO…which is a blip in terms of time and spead.

What has happened, though, are herds of elk, moose and deer that never had the disease are now inundated and declining in certain areas.
 

mt terry d

WKR
Shoot2HuntU
Joined
Jul 18, 2023
Messages
846
It was first discovered nearly 60 years ago, in CO…which is a blip in terms of time and spead.

What has happened, though, are herds of elk, moose and deer that never had the disease are now inundated and declining in certain areas.
Could you please post a link to the CWD testing done on moose & elk in CO from, say,
45 years ago? The rate of increase of CWD in those herds would be quite interesting.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
1,087
Location
Colorado
Could you please post a link to the CWD testing done on moose & elk in CO from, say,
45 years ago? The rate of increase of CWD in those herds would be quite interesting.
45 years ago?

Look no further than Estes elk herd, moose in FairPlay, mule deer at NCAR or deer and elk on Ft. Carson.

Many more examples I’m sure…just a few that I’m familiar with.
 
Top