AkRyan
WKR
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 745
I'm not and never will because best isn't a word that belongs in this discussion! We just didn't expect to see what we did.Which setup are you saying is best?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not and never will because best isn't a word that belongs in this discussion! We just didn't expect to see what we did.Which setup are you saying is best?
makes total senseI'm not and never will because best isn't a word that belongs in this discussion! We just didn't expect to see what we did.
I'm not and never will because best isn't a word that belongs in this discussion! We just didn't expect to see what we did.
Very interesting! Glad you posted this. Precision Cut Archery and Easton seem to be doing a big arrow ballistic coefficient/drag/lift study right now (presumably to catalog all these different drag profiles and improve sight tape creation).
I’ll have to look up some downrange data I collected last year on the same arrow but fletched with Arizona Max Helical and Bitz 2deg offset/helical clamp. The data suggested there was not much difference which was surprising. Similar conclusion as what you posted above
This stuff is pretty interesting to test out for yourself which is where I’m at. I did a downrange test with my “turkey” arrow using 4 fletch, lighter overall weight etc. I saw the same thing which is totally expected but still cool to proveThe heavier arrows of course retained velocity better, but some of the lighter ones were going faster at 65 yards still than I think shafts 100 grs heavier were at launch, or something like that.