Dan MT
FNG
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2023
- Messages
- 25
8 x 32 seems to be made for early bow and I'd never leave without my 10 x 40's during gun. How about you...are there some other favored power and depth of field preferences out there? If so...why?
I used to switch back and forth but ended up just running my 11x42’s for everything the last couple of years without issue. Shots are closer with bow hunting, but I still want a good look at any animal I can see.
I have the Sig Sauer Zulu9 11x45mm HDX…I fat fingered 42mm. I think they are very similar to the Mavens. They do well in low light. Haven’t had an issue. They are a little bulky but not too bad.Are you using maven b2 11x45?
If so how do they fare in low light in the timber?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I tried having multiple binos and landed on my 10x50s.
Same here. 10x50’s.
My thoughts match the quotes above.I find 8x42, 10x50 and 6.5x32 to be solid bow season choices.
Are you using maven b2 11x45?
If so how do they fare in low light in the timber?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With your views on the 8x32 how do you feel about a 10x32? I am looking at getting one of these types for an LRF bino. I am stuck. Mostly I hunt archery, but I want one that's still decent for rifle.8x32 for archery elk in the timber. I’ll die on this hill. In my experience FOV trumps magnification for that situation; and the lower bulk/less weight is sure nice when you are racking up 8-10 hard miles each day. Typically I can’t see far enough to even feel the need to do much glassing anyway, and for the handful of times that I do the 8x32 has been plenty. I might not be able to count tines, but I can tel if there is an elk over there or not, and if it’s a bull, and that’s all I really need.
12x42 for rifle. These things are flat out amazing. Great in the hand, but I Love them on a tripod. Still have a Huge FOV. I love this pairing.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro