5/7 is crazy good odds of seeing a 200” buck. I’ve hunted good areas for 15 years and never seems. 200. Several over the 180” mark, and there are 200”rs killed about every year around. But that is pretty nuts.I'd say the way you stated that you regularly see 200" deer leades one to believe you are saying you see them all the time driving down the road. I'd say regularly would be every year to me, not really 5/7 however it is still pretty impressive.
I wouldn't be going on the internet to tell everyone about it, but that's just me. Never understood why everyone brags about big animals, then complains about people hunting everywhere.
5/7 is crazy good odds of seeing a 200” buck. I’ve hunted good areas for 15 years and never seems. 200. Several over the 180” mark, and there are 200”rs killed about every year around. But that is pretty nuts.
Haha dido!! Unfortunately most of the Midwest states have general rifle tags during the rut, I believe that is the biggest hinderance to many large deer. Need age to get that big.Agreed. However, if I was seeing deer that big, that often, there is a 0% chance I would be posting that on the internet!
Have seen some very nice deer while hunting south dakota.
being from Wisconsin i want to believe their is some other sacred place but the fact is this is the best state to Kill a BiG Buck. Second would have to be Sask or Alberta.
Im not sure what you mean? our winters are only 6 months longSeems like all these other places must not enter in the record books. They did start to keep stats for a reason, I guess it must be those long winter's up there y'all don't have a thing to do but sit around and measure deer.
I've only hunted South Dakota twice, total of six days, and have barely hunted outside of Montana so not an expert. However, I was amazed at how many big white tail I saw in SD. A local I was hunting with shot a big framed, really nice 5x5 white tail. I'm running over to high five him and whoop it up, only to find that he was really disappointment at how small it was!
It’s not WI. I’m lookin at MO, MN, and OH.
A couple of reasons I think. And I don’t think any of this stuff is new either. Our deer here get pounded, I think we hunt harder than just about any place else in the country. We kill a way higher percentage a yearling bucks here. We’re at north of 60%, whereas the national average is about 30% on yearling bucks per QDMA. As a state, we have an it’s brown it’s down mentality. That coupled with relatively fragmented land ownership in the southern 2/3 of the state where we have a good wooded/ag mix makes it tough to consistently take big deer or big deer at all.Always curious why you guys dominate the record books but it supposedly sucks now. Not disagreeing but would love some better understanding.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Kansas | 1246 |
Iowa | 1246 |
Indiana | 1288 |
Kentucky | 1512 |
Ohio | 1688 |
Illinois | 1884 |
Wisconsin | 2149 |
Nebraska | 2564 |
Minnesota | 3093 |
Missouri | 3385 |