Chris in TN
Lil-Rokslider
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2025
- Messages
- 105
Am I wrong that a lot of secondary lower-popularity hiking trails in beetle kill (or burned) areas are growing up because the USFS and local volunteer groups simply don't have the resources to keep up with all the dead trees falling everywhere so people are just avoiding them?
Looking at some aerial imagery of some spots last night, I noticed that some trails that were very visible in years past on older GE historical imagery, were almost invisible (or completely invisible in places) on newer imagery of similar resolution.
I keep hearing to mentally block out areas near such trails as places to hold elk. But I know that deer will hang out closer to such roads/trails and also know that the reality is that elk pretty much have to cross roads/trails to migrate and with low enough pressure they don't completely abandon those areas and hunting pressure makes them do strange things and I'm certain that people that know their hunt areas kill stuff near roads/trails every year. But as an easterner with little public experience out west I *generally* think I'm better off getting away from trails. But what if those trails aren't so trail-y anymore? Am I right that as soon as human use goes down the elk lose their motivation to stay away?
I also realize that such a trail could be faded on two year old imagery but a group of volunteers could be out there right now opening it then the entire local hiking community might be out there hiking it on opening day of elk season and the only way to know is to be there. But, just generally speaking, am I correct that some of the trails are growing up, seeing less human use and therefore more elk use, because of the overwhelming level of beetle kill?
Looking at some aerial imagery of some spots last night, I noticed that some trails that were very visible in years past on older GE historical imagery, were almost invisible (or completely invisible in places) on newer imagery of similar resolution.
I keep hearing to mentally block out areas near such trails as places to hold elk. But I know that deer will hang out closer to such roads/trails and also know that the reality is that elk pretty much have to cross roads/trails to migrate and with low enough pressure they don't completely abandon those areas and hunting pressure makes them do strange things and I'm certain that people that know their hunt areas kill stuff near roads/trails every year. But as an easterner with little public experience out west I *generally* think I'm better off getting away from trails. But what if those trails aren't so trail-y anymore? Am I right that as soon as human use goes down the elk lose their motivation to stay away?
I also realize that such a trail could be faded on two year old imagery but a group of volunteers could be out there right now opening it then the entire local hiking community might be out there hiking it on opening day of elk season and the only way to know is to be there. But, just generally speaking, am I correct that some of the trails are growing up, seeing less human use and therefore more elk use, because of the overwhelming level of beetle kill?