I have the Moose bag, and I am not sure right now of the dimensions but it is not big enough. I have been looking at getting a new Barney's bag, but the Wrangell bag looks like something I want. But, man. How could anything cost more than a barney's bag.? $525.00?I use the NRS straps too and have used several different kinds of dry bags. It dosent really matter, just trap it down securely and you are good to go.
I will mention that it seems strange for people to ask questions about wright when it comes to Barney’s packs, if wright is an issue, there are better frames out there. I feel like these frames had a fairly specific niche of hauling meat but for whatever reason, you see guys using them for sheep hunts etc. I think that is more nostalgia than anything but to each their own.
I’ve tried every frame I have with well over 100lbs in it and the Barney’s is the best because of how easily you can lash things down. I agree with ditching the top frame piece but I disagree with ditching the meat shelf, why would somebody do that? It works really REALLY well, if it dosent, then you have some adjustments to make.
I have no opinion on the Barney’s bags but wrangell gear is also making a bag for Barney’s frames. In my opinion, the Barney’s frame is pretty essential for low country moose and bear hunts but there are better choices for mountain hunting or anytime weight is a consideration.
I have a kifaru 28” tactical frame with a cargo net and yes, you can haul heavy loads with it and a guy could do a lot worse but for my uses it’s not as good as the Barney’s.
Also, somebody mentioned that the earlier Barney’s packs mimicked the camp trail frames….hell, as far as I know, at one time they were actually made by camp trails. Hang out with any old school alaskan hunter though and you’ll likely see a few camp trips frames hanging in the garage.
Last edited: