Balancing Sheep Shape and Beach Body

[Cactus kid]

I think this article is interesting regarding where you want to be based on your goals/hunts/endeavors:

Ideal Bodyweights for Mountain Athletes, Mountain Professionals and Tactical Athletes

By Rob Shaul For years I’ve answered questions from individual mountain and tactical athletes and/or given unsolicited advice on a target bodyweight based on height, but until now, I’ve never formalized these ideal bodyweight targets. Everything MTI does is focused on improving and/or maximizing...

mtntactical.com

I am definitely on the fatty side of these charts at 6'1" and 213 lbs.
The link didn't show this chart, and I am in no way "tactical", but 190 seems like a more comfortable weight for me. I felt the best when I was around that weight and focused on single leg strength and muscle endurance.

View attachment 1088202

I remember reading this a couple years ago. Im 30lbs over the "ideal" and havent seen that weight since freshman year. I have been successful on some pretty cool mountain hunts.

OP i am sure you have already figured out that you would be more efficient at a lower body weight, but you can still be successful consistently at a heavier one. You understand there is no free lunch. But there is no reason you cant be a successful sheep hunter AND be a big dude. Only you can decide if its worth it.

 

[180ls1]

Nailed it.

Look, OP, I'm probably the least muscular person in this entire thread, but even I have already learned that skinny beats 'ripped' once you get off flat ground.

If you are looking for balance (OP) being "skinny" or the "least muscular" does not help you either. I think you'd be surprised how differently women (even men) respond to you if you have a good build.

 

[grizz19]

Man for me I’ve done the mtn tough program the last 18 months and it’s really been a good balance. They have different programs for different times of the year. Has programs to prep for season and winter programs to put on muscle and strength. I’ve been really happy with my physique, as well as my performance on the mountain.

 

[Hnthrdr]

“Guys I’m too jacked a tan and fit, any advice for a total chad stud muffin?!” Serious replies only!

Just be an athlete. This is my only advice. I’m sorry you are burdened by big muscles and sheep tags hahaha

Really a personal thing guys but have been thinking about starting a thread for how to elk hunt when you have ungodly large hammer of a hang down? How to I balance this burden with a pants and pack that will work while I kill 380 bulls?

 

[Hnthrdr]

I think this article is interesting regarding where you want to be based on your goals/hunts/endeavors:

Ideal Bodyweights for Mountain Athletes, Mountain Professionals and Tactical Athletes

By Rob Shaul For years I’ve answered questions from individual mountain and tactical athletes and/or given unsolicited advice on a target bodyweight based on height, but until now, I’ve never formalized these ideal bodyweight targets. Everything MTI does is focused on improving and/or maximizing...

mtntactical.com

I am definitely on the fatty side of these charts at 6'1" and 213 lbs.
The link didn't show this chart, and I am in no way "tactical", but 190 seems like a more comfortable weight for me. I felt the best when I was around that weight and focused on single leg strength and muscle endurance.

View attachment 1088202

Is this a chart showing what twinks should weigh? Lolz

 

[jimh406]

At 185, I could go a day or two on very little food, still put on miles, and be okay. Now, if I miss a meal, my body lets me know fast. The glucose crash happens stupidly quick.

My guess is you eat remarkably different at the higher weight. If you ate very little carbs as a 185 person, and up the carbs quite a lot to maintain the heavy weight, You are comparing what could be Keto past a non-Keto diet. It will make a difference in a constant demand for food.

I'd compare what you eat at both weights to find out if it is just calories or carb/fat/protein difference.

 

[DisplacedHusky]

The football coach adage “Looks like Tarzan, plays like Jane” may be applicable.

As I get into my late 40s I have found a happy medium with my weight where I can do all the things I want to. As I age I want to keep muscle mass but now I focus more on mobility and athleticism.

A good test is to go play a sport. Many of us stop actually playing sports as we age and the amount of athleticism I’ve lost since my teens and 20s is noticeable. My mind says I can do all the moves I used to, but my body says “How about we make this look like you’ve been drinking.”

Crossing rivers and scree fields is no different. Athleticism matters. Just find a happy medium that allows you to feel good (mentally and physically) and do all the things you want to do.

 

[P Carter]

I think this article is interesting regarding where you want to be based on your goals/hunts/endeavors:

Ideal Bodyweights for Mountain Athletes, Mountain Professionals and Tactical Athletes

By Rob Shaul For years I’ve answered questions from individual mountain and tactical athletes and/or given unsolicited advice on a target bodyweight based on height, but until now, I’ve never formalized these ideal bodyweight targets. Everything MTI does is focused on improving and/or maximizing...

mtntactical.com

I am definitely on the fatty side of these charts at 6'1" and 213 lbs.
The link didn't show this chart, and I am in no way "tactical", but 190 seems like a more comfortable weight for me. I felt the best when I was around that weight and focused on single leg strength and muscle endurance.

View attachment 1088202

I always scratch my head/look for reality check when reading heights/weights on hunting forums; they always seem really high to me.

I hit this chart right on the nose: 5' 10", 170-175, move well in the mountains, not all that strong from a "true weight-lifter" perspective, but I've never felt limited by strength. Same height/weight and pant size as in high school. Boxed at 168 in college. I focused on lifting for a time and got up to 190, felt sluggish and heavy. When I do a focused strength phase, I can get up to around 177 but really don't like going higher than that--I just feel heavy, less agile, etc.

To be clear, everyone charts their own course, where I feel comfortable doesn't really mean anything, but thanks for sharing this resource, it can be a decent reality check.

A recent podcast from the Hunt Backcountry podcast addressed this a bit and came down similarly, as I recall, I think the fellow was Vince Paikowski.

 

[Shootinsurveyor]

The football coach adage “Looks like Tarzan, plays like Jane” may be applicable.

As I get into my late 40s I have found a happy medium with my weight where I can do all the things I want to. As I age I want to keep muscle mass but now I focus more on mobility and athleticism.

A good test is to go play a sport. Many of us stop actually playing sports as we age and the amount of athleticism I’ve lost since my teens and 20s is noticeable. My mind says I can do all the moves I used to, but my body says “How about we make this look like you’ve been drinking.”

Crossing rivers and scree fields is no different. Athleticism matters. Just find a happy medium that allows you to feel good (mentally and physically) and do all the things you want to do.

I had the same realization as I faceplanted hopping rocks in the river while fishing. Playing tennis with my kid has helped with quickness and balance. Played lots of sports and have worked outside most of my life up to the last 5 years or so. Just gotta be realistic about performance ability at this point.