Backfire 20 round group video/data

dårlig jeger

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Nov 23, 2025
Messages
143

Kind of a neat Backfire video where he compiles data from 20 shot groups from a couple dozen different rifles.

Spoiler: the only correlation to smaller groups is less recoil. Spoiler 2: the most accurate gun under $1k is a 6.5 creedmoor tikka.

He has the data available for download. Anyone else look into this? Any other conclusions?
 
It’s a great test and video. He put the info out for free to anyone interested. I got the Excel sheet before I saw the video. People are already poking holes in it but the bottom line is how many actually will go out there and spend the money and time to do stuff like this? It’s just great info to look at and use to build on your own experiences.
 
Mostly good, but the final moments where (after praising the T3x) he trashes CHF barrels...
I caught that, too. Little bit of a disconnect there.
I’m not sure he “trashes” CHF barrels. Just notes what you can see sometimes.

Just because Tikka’s have CHF barrels and generally shoot well doesn’t mean all budget CHF rifles are consistent. Both things can be true.
 
What is Jim’s user handle on Rokslide? 🤔

Dude has to be trolling this forum for ideas…
I think he stops by. He even featured the rokstock on his SHOT show video a year or two ago. He's come around on larger group sizes and field shooting challenges and lower recoil. His arc follows a lot of people that start with a more traditional mindset when they come here.

He's not on board with scope drop testing, but he could be. If he took drop testing mainstream, it would be a big step forward towards recognition and more people seeing the issues.
 
I’m not sure he “trashes” CHF barrels. Just notes what you can see sometimes.

Just because Tikka’s have CHF barrels and generally shoot well doesn’t mean all budget CHF rifles are consistent. Both things can be true.
I've ran a handfull of different barrel brands over the years, and when available in a cartridge and twist I'm looking for, I actually prefer OEM Tikka take offs as replacements for Tikka actions. They're generally as accurate as anything, at least for my purposes, and they seem to outlast others I've ran - sometimes by a lot. CHF resulta in a very hard barrel.
 
Spoiler: the only correlation to smaller groups is less recoil. Spoiler 2: the most accurate gun under $1k is a 6.5 creedmoor tikka.

Goes back to Kieth and O'conner, and likely much further than that.

To me, the main thing that's changed in the bigger always better vs less recoil = better shot placement argument is that there is now significantly more data on the terminal effects of bullets, substantiating that smaller diameter bullets are quite effective at delivering wounds incompatible with life. Years ago such data was largely anecdotal, and the reporting on cause and effect was often more attributional than actual.

I was not one of them - the majority of my big game hunting over the past 35 years has been done with various 7mm, 300 and 338 magnums - but astute hunters have long known that medium velocity, short actions such as 260, 7mm-08, 308, etc with ordinary cup and core bullets were both easy to shoot well and exceptional killers of large and small game both near to pretty far. Long before the 6.5 CM was introduced, my old logger buddy killed everything big and small with a couple of 260's. He always laughed at my many magnums.
 
Back
Top