Arken EPL-4 4-16x44mm Q&A

[Elite]

Does anyone know how thick the lines are on this scope? Wanting to compare it to the maven rs1.2 mill version


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[RWT]

Does anyone know how thick the lines are on this scope? Wanting to compare it to the maven rs1.2 mill version


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

These are on backorder currently. May be better off with a SWFA. 3x15

 

[BLJ]

Does anyone know how thick the lines are on this scope? Wanting to compare it to the maven rs1.2 mill version


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Says stadia is .03 and center dot is .04 for the MIL version on their site.
Also let me put one in my cart so showing availability.

 

[Elite]

These are on backorder currently. May be better off with a SWFA. 3x15

Maybe in the states? Their website says I can buy one? I’m from Canada


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[nortac]

Also, I have gotten quite a few questions about what the rifles go through while riding in the truck on Forest service roads. Some think near pavement smooth, and some thing true rock climbing. Somewhere in the middle. This is about as rough as it usually is-

After watching that video maybe you should be doing field evaluations for TRUCKS!

 

[Neil84]

Well damn I have just been looking at getting a EPL4 for a 223 build I’m putting together, not so sure now. Lots of features I like, simple reticle for my eye and not a bad price as I’m in NZ.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[walk2112]

I put one of these on a T1x 22LR for PRS 22 and plinking trainer this winter. It had a cushy life, range only, padded case every where it went, probably dialed it up and back to zero (less than 10 mils dialed each time, usually less than 5) maybe 25 times before something weird happened with the elevation adjustment, it was off by .5+ mils (high) and had a new crunchy/stiff feeling when dialing the last 4-7 clicks back to zero stop, felt different every time I tried.
Garbage in disguise is my opinion of them.

 

[Bountyhunter]

Maybe I'm not searching the right thing, but is there a thread where you have a running list of all scopes that have passed the field eval? I see this kinda quick list you have here which is a good start, but I'm not seeing a thread dedicated to those that passed.
There is this thread: https://rokslide.com/forums/threads/scope-evaluation-passed-models.319071/
But I'd love to see just your list in a simple single post.

Follow-up: are there any assumptions to be made re: scope model line or manufacturer?
Credo in 3-9 is good, so credo in 2.5-15 should also be good?
Maven rs1.2 is good, other maven lines should also be good?

I generally feel like all assumptions are probably bad/risky.

Any thoughts appreciated.

What about the rings that are proven to be reliable in these tests? Can we have a list of them?