Are 8’s enough for out West?

Joined
Apr 1, 2016
Messages
733
Location
Eastern Washington
2x isn't going to be a game changer for this application

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
2x isn't a game changer until it is. Considering you and I don't know where the OP is hunting, the magnification question has an open ended answer. For my hunting it makes a difference. For his hunting I have no idea so didn't say one way or the other.
 

ramont

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Nov 19, 2017
Messages
259
Location
Montana
I live in SW Montana and I use a 6 power rangefinder, 10x40 binoculars, and a 10-20 power spotting scope with image stabalization. Most of the time I use the rangefinder while moving. I use the binoculars while sitting more often than I use the spotter but if I want to see something that is far off in detail then I use the 10-20 power spotting scope because it allows me to see well enough out to 1000 yards to at least see if the elk is a bull. I hunt where the bulls require a brow tine of certain length to be legal. Since I hunt from a ground blind most often I prefer to use the rangefinder or the binoculars for most of my spotting. Most people tend to think of binoculars as a light alternative to a spotting scope but I notice that nobody has mentioned that they are also fantastic for helping you to see the fine details close up. As I scan the area close to me I look for elk/deer parts, not the entire animal. I look for legs, ears, noses, antler tips, etc. and a 10 power is great for providing me with a clear, crisp image of what's in those tangled messes of downed trees.
 

realunlucky

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 20, 2013
Messages
13,220
Location
Eastern Utah
We will have to agree to disagree on this. Imo 2x just doesn't make that difference in detail. Of course I run slc 8's and my hunting partner runs 10's I have compared them side by side more than once and think it's a moot point.
2x isn't a game changer until it is. Considering you and I don't know where the OP is hunting, the magnification question has an open ended answer. For my hunting it makes a difference. For his hunting I have no idea so didn't say one way or the other.

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
 
OP
Pezboat

Pezboat

WKR
Joined
Mar 15, 2018
Messages
411
Location
Minneapolis
All of this is great advice. I think I’m leaning towards 8x42’s for a few reasons. First, they’ll work best for hunting thick cover in my home state while chasing whitetails (95% of the usage). 2nd, it’s pretty flat here. So thin air and mountains will make it very hard for me to freehand with 10’s (and yes, I do have a tripod). And finally, I’m pretty realistic and realize that my first few hunts, I’d consider just seeing elk a win. I think with 8’s I’ll be able to do that. This is for a 2019 elk hunt. Most likely OTC. I haven’t picked a state or unit yet, so I’m not sure what the terrain will be like.
 
Top