This pod cast is what has landed me on this forum. The part about bucks not going down hill until the end is exactly what I have seen in my 40+ years of shed hunting. Rapid growth at first, then slowing till about age 6 and then fairly steady until death with maybe one year of decline at the end of life. However I rarely see the best set of antlers at age six. Maybe this is because bucks in SE MT just have it easier than bucks in Western WY. Probably found antlers from/watched at least a two dozen bucks that lived to 8+ and this almost always the pattern of growth, but there are always a few exceptions. The whitetail I shot a few years back comes to mind. Was always better the next year and then he exploded with mass and NT points at age eight, Pictures are from that whitetail and a 200+ mule deer from the 80's. The last year the mule deer regressed 20+ inches. Hard to say how old he was. I have seven years of antlers and I am confident he was not a 180+ two year old with the smallest single and I could have missed a year or two of sheds in that juniper jungle. At least 10 years old any way.
edit: If some of the mule deer antlers look old and chewed it is because they are. Took me 13 and 14 year to match up the two sets on the bottom row. Mostly because when I found the first two antlers a half mile apart I thought I had a set. Wrong.
View attachment 721815View attachment 721817