I’m certified multiple formats. You can’t comprehend English obviously. That doesn’t matter. What matters is someone is asking a simple question. It’s good to give him varying opinions. However you seem to want to argue. I’d be glad to discuss anything you like in a pm, on the phone or start a new thread and we can debate it there.
Pretty classy the way you speak btw. Parents should be proud of you. Save the he man junk for someone in person. Doing so on here shows something
Weasel words isn't an insult. Its an actual term. It means that the language used allows for the denial of a specific claim.
If you truly think a repeatable anchor can be performed without proper back tension then say so in unequivocal terms.
And then I'd be all ears on how your certifications in multiple formats can reconcile the teaching of an anchoring system that allows for variation.
I find it hard to believe you're a coach as you imply when you are advocating for a soft tissue anchor.
Also how does one get the string on the tip of their nose if they are anchoring high on their face and also keep their head down? You have to raise your head turn it from your target in order to accomplish that.
You flip flop all over the place.
With proper back tension and a two point bone to bone connection your anchor can't change. It's impossible. Your draw length can't vary. And your sight picture remains the same. Period.
I can English just fine. Go back and read what you wrote.
I'm perfectly OK with keeping this in the open forum. That's what forums are for.
Feel free to explain yourself, or not. Like you said the guy asked a simple question and should get some varying opinions. Well, unless someone disagrees with you I suppose.