- Banned
- #321
I realize you're being facetious or absurd, but it's funny how the Hollywood folks would think you are defending them...I totally believe the gun went off without the trigger getting pulled. I also doubt he even pointed the gun at someone, it likely pointed itself. Happens all the time. Some guns just go rogue and have a mind of their own, can't fault the person #itsthegunsfault
I was wondering about this as well. I had heard a rumor it may have been modified for "fanning" - so the hammer wouldn't actually lock back after being cocked, so they can look faster on screen in classic hollywood style where they cock it with the palm of the left hand... Still violated the other 3 rules of gun safety so it doesn't eliminate blame in my book.Does anyone know that exact replica revolver?
Does it have a half cock or hammer block?
And how much outcry will there be from the BLM and media about white privilege? Will there be protests and endless media buzz about how another white person subverted justice because of his skin color? I doubt it, that's only the case if your not a liberal.Pass the buck, pass the buck, pass the buck. AB is a douche and it’s unlikely any charges get filed. Hollywood elite and all that…
This is such an excellent point...or he would have hired his own personal checker because he apparently just wants to make money with guns, as opposed to taking the time to actually learn safety protocols that he can do in just a few seconds when the firearm is placed in his hands as a double-check to ensure no one is hurt.I’ll guarantee if he was rehearsing a scene involving suicide or Russian roulette, he would have checked the gun.
Ha! I see what you did there.....I've seen commentary by an LEO on a pistol site that owns this same cowboy gun replica and his has a Firing pin block and a half cock....so a person cannot fire the pistol by releasing the hammer as Baldwin claims.
It could be that Baldwins softball interview by his Hamptons friend and sidekick Stephanopolous might just horribly backfire on him.
>
This was a mainstay in my investigations and affidavits. LOVED having the power of a signed statement to compare to video, audio, or other irrefutable evidence.I’m assuming AB ha already been interviewed by detectives. Would be interesting to see if he told investigators the same thing- I didn’t pull the trigger? If so would be relatively easy to check any film that was rolling at the time and/or have a firearms person at their crime lab to see if the firearm in question could have been fired out without a trigger pull.
If he lied to investigators, at a minimum charge him with that.
Lots of people think Martha Stewart went to prison for insider trading, in fact she went for lying to investigators. I’d like to thank Martha Stewart as by using that example I was able to illicit numerous confessions from poachers over the years
I read elsewhere (and have unsuccessfully tried to verify on the Pietta website) that there are 2 versions of the revolver - one with a transfer bar safety and one without. IMO it would be possible for a gun to fire without pulling the trigger if it did not have a half cock and transfer bar safety. I have a Freedom Arms SA revolver without a TBS and the manual says not to carry it with a loaded chamber under the hammer as a hard impact on the hammer can cause the round to fire.I've seen commentary by an LEO on a pistol site that owns this same cowboy gun replica and his has a Firing pin block and a half cock....so a person cannot fire the pistol by releasing the hammer as Baldwin claims.
It could be that Baldwins softball interview by his Hamptons friend and sidekick Stephanopolous might just horribly backfire on him.
>