fatrascal
WKR
A pretty interesting video. My vote goes to the 10mm. Fatrascal.
The bear died in every shot with both the 10 and 9 in the ballistics gel.
A pretty interesting video. My vote goes to the 10mm. Fatrascal.
Those impacts are irrelevant if they're not CNS hits. CNS hits either make the lights to out instantly or sever nerves to limbs making them go down like a sack of potatoes. Everything else at that range with a charging bear means the bear is on top of you. You can put 6 though it's heart with a 44 at that range and you're still getting mauled. It'll die a few minutes after it gets done tearing you a new one.The Underwood 124 grain 9mm +p Jacketed Flat Nose and the same in 147 actually penetrate better than their hard cast 147s. That being said, it is not just about penetration, the impact of the round has to be significant enough to deter the charge
On average a 10mm has double the impact force of a 9mm, that is SIGNIFICANT.
I put wild broke leg cattle down with a TCP 380 and p365 9mm.I roll either with a 10mm or if it's a long hike in a lightweight 357. You know the saying, "Better to have it and not need it, than need it and not have it."" Lotta of moose where I hunt, black bears not much a problem as long as camp is kept clean. Anybody try shooting a moose in self-defense with a 9mm? It's not gonna end well for the shooter.
Same. Glock 20, 10mm, Underwood hard-cast. Some say the G20 isn't accurate with hard-cast but it's worked well for me at the range. If in grizzly country, Ruger Super Redhawk, 44-mag.A pretty interesting video. My vote goes to the 10mm. Fatrascal.