90/10 Rejected

[ScottR_EHJ]

Wyoming Wildlife Taskforce Rejects 90/10 - Eastmans' Official Blog | Mule Deer, Antelope, Elk Hunting and Bowhunting Magazine | Eastmans' Hunting Journals

For the past 14 months, the Wyoming Wildlife Taskforce has debated some of the most contentio

blog.eastmans.com

For all of you following this!

 

[trophyhill]

I expect the usual suspects will come out in favor of a boycot.....

 

[Novahunter]

So, you're telling me there is a chance....

 

[amassi]

Weird they voted to keep an outfitter pool

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

 

[isItFallYet]

 

[EdP]

Weird they voted to keep an outfitter pool

I don't understand the above comment. Per the article: "Then, both the 90/10 and outfitter draw (propositions 2 and 6) were voted for rejection." As I read it the "outfitter pool" was rejected. Landowner licenses are still being considered.

 

[ScottR_EHJ]

Weird they voted to keep an outfitter pool

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

The outfitter pool was rejected as well.

 

[Jaden Bales]

Not thinking they’re gonna change a WHOLE lot with landowner licenses. But it’ll be worth watching.

 

[pirogue]

Hopefully, the “outfitter pool” that was rejected, was the selfishly ridiculous proposal that 50% of NR tags have to be outfitted?

 

[Indian Summer]

And just like that all those task force meetings meant nothing. Gotta love that.

 

[River_Rat]

Looks like they are suggesting 40 to 50% increases in NR tag prices.

 

[axeforce6]

So, you're telling me their is a chance....

What’s all this one in a million talk?

 

[CoStick]

Looks like they are suggesting 40 to 50% increases in NR tags.

Prices, quantity, or both?

 

[River_Rat]

Prices, quantity, or both?

Prices. My bad I had to edit my post so it's corrected.

 

[CoStick]

Prices. My bad I had to edit my post so it's corrected.

Thank you, I don’t care about price too much.

 

[River_Rat]

Thank you, I don’t care about price too much.

Same here. Selfishly I want them to raise to a price where a lot of people will stop applying. Whatever gives me the best chance at more tags.

 

[RyanT26]

Same here. Selfishly I want them to raise to a price where a lot of people will stop applying. Whatever gives me the best chance at more tags.

Same. If that’s what it takes to thin the crowd, fine by me.

 

[CoStick]

Same here. Selfishly I want them to raise to a price where a lot of people will stop applying. Whatever gives me the best chance at more tags.

I hear that, I appreciate that they listened. It is encouraging to have a voice in the process.

 

[Northpark]

Same here. Selfishly I want them to raise to a price where a lot of people will stop applying. Whatever gives me the best chance at more tags.

I used to think that way. Then inflation caught up and now I’ve mostly been priced out of hunting at this point unless it’s local deer, bear and predators. So you already don’t have me to compete with. Not necessarily a “poor me” statement just that my salary can’t keep up and my family comes first so well hunting goes.

 

[pirogue]

I’m not sure higher tag prices will keep that many away, for the big picture. Many people live to hunt, and are going to pay the price. I just returned from a West Coast trip, and judging by the crowds and RVs on the highways and in the campgrounds, no one stayed home because of higher fuel prices. Some view hunting tag prices the same way my grandpa told me about his neighbor’s habits. When the store clerk told him that the price of a glass of snuff went up to two bits, he replied, “they never have charged what it’s worth”