Exactly! If he was aiming for the box, and hit the spine, I’d consider that lucky. If it were me I’d be aiming in that box, and if I end up catching spine I consider myself lucky. I’m not aiming for the spine at 600 yards. 100 yards? Different story. Neither distance is wrong.
I have zero issue with a long range shot. Not at all. I had a similar situation as above this year. I was safety off at 500 yards, waiting for a slightly more broadside shot because my target grows 2x in size. I look back at my past and compare it to my lethality now, the biggest difference today is knowing when to take a risky shot and when to wait for a higher percentage shot.
I’m not at all criticizing the range of the shot. But I also understand that a reasonable cone of fire at that range is beyond the size of the spine or even a neck shot at that range. Again maybe we are watching the best shooter in the country shoot this bull, I don’t know, we don’t know.
Some are criticizing the range earlier, I don’t agree with them. It is actually good seeing those reactions because it shows you how hard it is to actually spot your shot at that range. These are skills that are hard to master.
There would be a huge difference for me if this elk was at 200 yards. I know I can be near pinpoint precise at 200 yards. At that range actually going for a CNS hit would be a high percentage shot for me.
Again good discussion, I’m not crapping on you or the hunter just adding my 2 cents. And also kind of scratching my head wondering why people are thinking this is such a great shot.