I really appreciate the post. That seems like a much better stock.I actually just added 4oz to my howa superlite. Stockys came out with their VG2 stock for the rifle and I snagged one Black Friday. A tad bit heavier but loving the profile so far.
Dang it! That seems like a good idea other than spending the extra $$. Now you've got me thinking...I actually just added 4oz to my howa superlite. Stockys came out with their VG2 stock for the rifle and I snagged one Black Friday. A tad bit heavier but loving the profile so far.
View attachment 635768
Mostly for the vertical grip and cheek weld?I actually just added 4oz to my howa superlite. Stockys came out with their VG2 stock for the rifle and I snagged one Black Friday. A tad bit heavier but loving the profile so far.
View attachment 635768
Entirely for that reason… however, for some reason, the LOP is at least a half in shorter on the target stock… I had to fab a spacer out of micarta (Sometimes it is handy to be a knifemaker with supplies on hand.) I also had to design a 3D printed arca rail for the front that fit the contour of the forend at the point of the sling stud.Mostly for the vertical grip and cheek weld?
More false than true…Aren't those really light rifles hard to shoot accurately at distance?
I'm almost exclusively a Recurve guy for decades so don't beat me up...I'm considering picking up a lefty bolt rifle in 6mm, 6.5 or so.
I see guys saying the stock matters a lot- centered on bore...and those light rifles need a brake otherwise they don't shoot.
True or False?
Check out the Rearden Mfg. muzzle devices. Same system as the Q stuff but some more practical options for brakes, flash hiders, etc.I noticed the q cherry bomb on the muzzle there... what can you running on that outfit?
Howa mini in 6 ARC has me interested for my spawn who'll soon be hunting, and I like q's mount system.
Caliber choice matters (less is more when it comes to recoil). For example, I have two modified Kimber Hunters. One in 308 weighs 4.25lbs bare, and 5lbs 12oz including Suppressor, Scope, rings, scope covers, ammo holder, cheek riser, and my own diy vertical grip. The other in 6.5Creedmoor weighs 4.5lbs bare, and 6lbs 12oz including scope, suppressor, (7.5lbs with tripod). I can shoot sub 4 inch groups at 500 yards with the 6.5creed, but I have a hard time getting 3 shots out of 10 on a 10 inch gong at 400 yards with the 308win (unless its sandwiched between sand bags, then it will put 5 shots under MOA and 10 shots under 1.5MOA). The difference is the recoil impulse moves the rifle slightly, even before the bullet leaves the barrel.. and this is magnified in lightweight rifles. The more recoil, the less easy it is to manage this. My limit for "ideal" shootability is about 9-9.5lbs for a 308win, 7.5-8lbs for a 6.5creed, 6.5-7lbs for a 6mm Creed, and 5lbs for a 223rem. That weight range would include the weight of all the features a rifle needs... scope, suppressor, rings, ammo, tripod, etc.Aren't those really light rifles hard to shoot accurately at distance?
I'm almost exclusively a Recurve guy for decades so don't beat me up...I'm considering picking up a lefty bolt rifle in 6mm, 6.5 or so.
I see guys saying the stock matters a lot- centered on bore...and those light rifles need a brake otherwise they don't shoot.
True or False?