I went through this internal debate for a while before settling on a G20 10mm. The main reason I went with the G20 over a 460 conversion is the fact I was able to get a G20 for a great price, but it didn't kill me that I wasn't getting that little bit of extra power of the 460. Here are my reasons why:
1. The hottest commercial 10mm load does 1200 FPS (a little more with an extended barrel) with a 220 grain hard cast bullet for 728 fpe. The heaviest commercial 460 load does 1300 FPS with a 255 grain hardcast bullet for 957 fpe. I'm only using the energy terms to compare the rounds. An angry griz doesn't care how much energy your bullet has. What I'm trying to point out is the only difference in external ballistics between the rounds is 100 FPS and 35 grains of bullet. At close range I don't think that is going to matter much. Now, what does kill bears that want to kill you is penetration, breaking bones, and damaging key CNS structures. The 220 10mm bullet has a higher sectional density than the 255 grain 45 bullet, so it should penetrate better. There's a video out there of the underwood 220 10mm load penetrating 14 water jugs and keep on going. That video was what finally sold me.
2. a Glock weighs less than a 1911. This was a personal preference that if I was gonna get a 460 rowland, it was going to be on a 1911 platform.
3. a 10mm holds more rounds
4. 10mm ammo is more easily found in stores if you get to your hunt destination without your ammo
5. IMO the idea of using a high powered autopistol over a revolver for bear protection is the ability to accurately put more rounds on target. The 10mm recoils less than a 460 rowland, so it should be easier to shoot
6. the 460 requires a compensator. not only does it make breaking down the pistol for cleaning a chore, but if you ever did have to use it without hearing protection, your hearing is gonna hurt for a while after that