gostovp
WKR
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2022
- Messages
- 534
So I upgraded to a new Mathews V3X 33 this year as I really liked the specs of the 33” ATA and the 6.5” brace height. I did NOT buy the Mathews for the Bridgelock sight or LowPro quiver technology, I bought it for the specs and how it shot for me. I have a 3 pin Spot Hogg Grinder non-micro adjustable… I love this sight because it’s dead simple and literally bomb proof….now I have people saying i should upgrade my sight to take advantage of the bridgelock technology … but literally all the sights for the Bridgelock are some kind of slider or movable pin ( there are few fixed pin out their like the Mathews one, but not many), and while I’m sure they are good sights, when I’m running up and down the mountains and dragging my bow through the briars and swamps here at home I just really like and trust my Spott Hogg Grinder.
1. Is the Bridgelock technology really that much better such that I should upgrade my sight? Note: I am not using the Mathews LowPro quiver either
2. I have the three pin Grinder because for my older eyes a 5 pin is just too much clutter. My personal max range on an elk size animal is 50 yards ( maybe 60 with known hold over).
Is setting up the Grinder at 30-40-50 a good compromise for not having a slider? I shoot a 420 gr Easton Axis at 28/60
1. Is the Bridgelock technology really that much better such that I should upgrade my sight? Note: I am not using the Mathews LowPro quiver either
2. I have the three pin Grinder because for my older eyes a 5 pin is just too much clutter. My personal max range on an elk size animal is 50 yards ( maybe 60 with known hold over).
Is setting up the Grinder at 30-40-50 a good compromise for not having a slider? I shoot a 420 gr Easton Axis at 28/60
Last edited: